Literature DB >> 19174179

The control parameters used by the CNS to guide the hand depend on the visuo-motor task: evidence from visually guided pointing.

L Thaler1, J T Todd.   

Abstract

To perform visually guided hand movements the visuo-motor system transforms visual information into movement parameters, invoking both central and peripheral processes. Central visuo-motor processes are active in the CNS, whereas peripheral processes are active at the neuromuscular junction. A major share of research attention regarding central visuo-motor processes concerns the question which parameters the CNS controls to guide the hand from one point to another. Findings in the literature are inconsistent. Whereas some researchers suggest that the CNS controls the hand displacement vector, others suggest that it controls final hand position. The current paper introduces a paradigm and analysis method designed to identify the parameters that the CNS controls to guide the hand. We use simulations to validate our analysis in the presence of peripheral visuo-motor noise and to estimate the level of peripheral noise in our data. Using our new tools, we show that hand movements are controlled either in terms of the hand displacement vector or in terms of final hand position, depending on the way visual information relevant for movement production is specified. Interestingly, our new analysis method reveals a difference in central visuo-motor processes, even though a traditional analysis of movement endpoint distributions does not. We estimate the level of peripheral noise in our data to be less than or equal to 40%. Based on our results we conclude that the CNS is flexible with regard to the parameters it controls to guide the hand; that spatial distributions of movement endpoints are not necessarily indicative of central visuo-motor processes; and that both peripheral and central noise has to be carefully considered in the interpretation of movement data.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19174179     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  6 in total

1.  Reaction times for allocentric movements are 35 ms slower than reaction times for target-directed movements.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motor learning reveals the existence of multiple codes for movement planning.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Sinusoidal error perturbation reveals multiple coordinate systems for sensorymotor adaptation.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Neural substrates of visual spatial coding and visual feedback control for hand movements in allocentric and target-directed tasks.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Motor planning poststroke: impairment in vector-coded reach plans.

Authors:  John-Ross Rizzo; Todd E Hudson; Andrew Abdou; Ira G Rashbaum; Ajax E George; Preeti Raghavan; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.