Literature DB >> 19173420

The relationship between pitch discrimination and vocal production: comparison of vocal and instrumental musicians.

Dee A Nikjeh1, Jennifer J Lister, Stefan A Frisch.   

Abstract

Auditory pitch discrimination and vocal pitch accuracy are fundamental abilities and essential skills of a professional singer; yet, the relationship between these abilities, particularly in trained vocal musicians, has not been the subject of much research. Difference limens for frequency (DLFs) and pitch production accuracy (PPA) were examined among 20 vocalists, 21 instrumentalists, and 21 nonmusicians. All were right-handed young adult females with normal hearing. Stimuli were harmonic tone complexes simulating piano tones and represented the mid-frequency of the untrained female vocal range, F0=261.63-392 Hz (C4-G4). DLFs were obtained by an adaptive psychophysical paradigm. Vocal pitch recordings were analyzed to determine PPA. Musicians demonstrated superior pitch discrimination and production accuracy compared to nonmusicians. These abilities did not distinguish instrumentalists and vocalists. DLF and PPA were significantly correlated with each other only for musicians with instrumental training; however, PPA was most consistent with minimal variance for vocalists. It would appear that a relationship between DLF and PPA develops with musical training, and these abilities can be differentially influenced by the type of specialty training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173420     DOI: 10.1121/1.3021309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Intermittent theta burst stimulation over right somatosensory larynx cortex enhances vocal pitch-regulation in nonsingers.

Authors:  Sebastian Finkel; Ralf Veit; Martin Lotze; Anders Friberg; Peter Vuust; Surjo Soekadar; Niels Birbaumer; Boris Kleber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  ERP correlates of auditory processing during automatic correction of unexpected perturbations in voice auditory feedback.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Laura Karvelis; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Vocal accuracy and neural plasticity following micromelody-discrimination training.

Authors:  Jean Mary Zarate; Karine Delhommeau; Sean Wood; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  On drawing a line through the spectrogram: how do we understand deficits of vocal pitch imitation?

Authors:  Peter Q Pfordresher; Pauline Larrouy-Maestri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Comprehensive genomic analyses associate UGT8 variants with musical ability in a Mongolian population.

Authors:  Hansoo Park; Seungbok Lee; Hyun-Jin Kim; Young Seok Ju; Jong-Yeon Shin; Dongwan Hong; Marcin von Grotthuss; Dong-Sung Lee; Changho Park; Jennifer Hayeon Kim; Boram Kim; Yun Joo Yoo; Sung-Il Cho; Joohon Sung; Charles Lee; Jong-Il Kim; Jeong-Sun Seo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Evidence for shared cognitive processing of pitch in music and language.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Evelina G Fedorenko; Louis Vinke; Edward Gibson; Laura C Dilley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Jennifer L O'Brien; Dee A Nikjeh; Jennifer J Lister
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.342

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.