Literature DB >> 19173144

[Social differences in the utilisation of prenatal screening, smoking during pregnancy and birth weight--empirical analysis of data from the Perinatal Study in Bavaria (Germany)].

D Koller1, N Lack, A Mielck.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Perinatal studies provide an excellent database for public health research, to date this potential has rarely been used, however. Taking the example of the Perinatal Study in Bavaria, the objective is to demonstrate the pros and cons of this database. As it includes only very few variables on socio-economic status, an additional variable is calculated assessing the socio-economic status of the community where the mother lives. This is rarely done in Germany, and as far as we know the procedure proposed here has not been applied before.
METHODS: The analyses are based on the data from 2004. They focus on three dependent variables: number of prenatal screenings, maternal smoking during pregnancy, birth weight of the baby. The following independent variables are included as well: age of the mother, nationality of the mother (e.g., German, Mediterranean countries), single mother (yes/no), occupational status of the mother, community where the mother lives (4- or 5-digit postal code). The socio-economic status of the community is assessed by the poverty rate, linking two other datasets, one for transferring the postal codes to community names, the other providing information per community. The multivariate analyses are conducted by logistic regressions.
RESULTS: Information was available from about 76 000 births. Concerning the variable 'few prenatal screenings', the analyses show an increased risk for mothers from Eastern Europe and from the Mediterranean countries, for single mothers and for mothers with low occupational status. The risk factor 'maternal smoking during pregnancy' is increased for mothers from the Mediterranean countries and for single mothers. It is especially high, however, for low status blue collar workers: compared with white collar workers their smoking prevalence is 4.67-times (large cities) or even 6.14-times (smaller communities) higher. The risk factor 'low birth weight of the baby' is again increased for single mothers and for mothers with low occupational status. An association with the poverty rate is mainly seen for the variable 'maternal smoking during pregnancy', with higher smoking prevalences in the poor communities. DISCUSSION: The results demonstrate that the data from the perinatal studies are important for public health research. Concerning the risk factors analysed here, large social differences can be observed. In order to show time trends, it would be important to repeat these analyses on a routine basis. From a methodological point of view, it can be stressed that regional differences in health and health care have rarely been looked at in Germany, and that the procedure proposed here provides a new starting point for closing this research gap.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173144     DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1082310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  10 in total

1.  Migrants and obstetrics in Austria--applying a new questionnaire shows differences in obstetric care and outcome.

Authors:  Willi Oberaigner; Hermann Leitner; Karin Oberaigner; Christian Marth; Gerald Pinzger; Hans Concin; Horst Steiner; Hannes Hofmann; Teresa Wagner; Manfred Mörtl; Angela Ramoni
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Social Disparities in Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy: Comparison of Two Birth Cohorts (1996-2002 and 2003-2012) Based on Data from the German KiGGS Study.

Authors:  B Kuntz; T Lampert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  The Relevance of Maternal Socioeconomic Characteristics for Low Birth Weight - a Case-Control Study.

Authors:  T Altenhöner; M Köhler; M Philippi
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Stillbirth differences according to regions of origin: an analysis of the German perinatal database, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Anna Reeske; Marcus Kutschmann; Oliver Razum; Jacob Spallek
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sinja Alexandra Ernst; Anna Reeske; Jacob Spallek; Knud Petersen; Tilman Brand; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Care-Related and Maternal Risk Factors Associated with the Antenatal Nondetection of Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Case-Control Study from Bremen, Germany.

Authors:  Sinja Alexandra Ernst; Tilman Brand; Anna Reeske; Jacob Spallek; Knud Petersen; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The influence of social determinants on the use of prevention and health promotion services: Results of a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Christian Janßen; Stefanie Sauter; Christoph Kowalski
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2012-10-25

8.  Access to Difficult-to-reach Population Subgroups: A Family Midwife Based Home Visiting Service for Implementing Nutrition-related Preventive Activities - A Mixed Methods Explorative Study.

Authors:  Helena Walz; Barbara Bohn; Jessica Sander; Claudia Eberle; Monika Alisch; Bernhard Oswald; Anja Kroke
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2015-08-21

9.  Inequalities in health care utilization among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jens Klein; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-11-01

10.  Information on, knowledge and utilisation of support services during pregnancy and after childbirth: cross-sectional analyses of predictors using data from the KUNO-Kids health study.

Authors:  Susanne Brandstetter; David Rothfuß; Birgit Seelbach-Göbel; Michael Melter; Michael Kabesch; Christian Apfelbacher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.