PURPOSE: To determine the impact of subtle differences (most notably in their classification of group E eyes) in two published versions of the ICRB (Philadelphia and the Children's Hospital Los Angeles). METHODS: Analysis of a series of 96 eyes with intra-ocular retinoblastoma. RESULTS: The disparate criteria of the 2 published ICRB schemas affected group assignment of 5.2% of the eyes (25% of the group E eyes). CONCLUSION: Discrepancies need to be reconciled to ensure accurate and uniform application of the ICRB.
PURPOSE: To determine the impact of subtle differences (most notably in their classification of group E eyes) in two published versions of the ICRB (Philadelphia and the Children's Hospital Los Angeles). METHODS: Analysis of a series of 96 eyes with intra-ocular retinoblastoma. RESULTS: The disparate criteria of the 2 published ICRB schemas affected group assignment of 5.2% of the eyes (25% of the group E eyes). CONCLUSION: Discrepancies need to be reconciled to ensure accurate and uniform application of the ICRB.
Authors: Jonathan W Kim; Sona N Shah; Sarah Green; John O'Fee; Benita Tamrazi; Jesse L Berry Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2019-08-17 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Helen Dimaras; Timothy W Corson; David Cobrinik; Abby White; Junyang Zhao; Francis L Munier; David H Abramson; Carol L Shields; Guillermo L Chantada; Festus Njuguna; Brenda L Gallie Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Jonathan E Lu; Jasmine H Francis; Ira J Dunkel; Carol L Shields; Michael D Yu; Jesse L Berry; Kaitlin Kogachi; Alison H Skalet; Audra K Miller; Pranav R Santapuram; Anthony B Daniels; David H Abramson Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 4.638