Literature DB >> 19172357

Temporal analysis of tumor heterogeneity and volume for cervical cancer treatment outcome prediction: preliminary evaluation.

Jeffrey W Prescott1, Dongqing Zhang, Jian Z Wang, Nina A Mayr, William T C Yuh, Joel Saltz, Metin Gurcan.   

Abstract

In this paper, we present a method of quantifying the heterogeneity of cervical cancer tumors for use in radiation treatment outcome prediction. Features based on the distribution of masked wavelet decomposition coefficients in the tumor region of interest (ROI) of temporal dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) studies were used along with the imaged tumor volume to assess the response of the tumors to treatment. The wavelet decomposition combined with ROI masking was used to extract local intensity variations in the tumor. The developed method was tested on a data set consisting of 23 patients with advanced cervical cancer who underwent radiation therapy; 18 of these patients had local control of the tumor, and five had local recurrence. Each patient participated in two DCE-MRI studies: one prior to treatment and another early into treatment (2-4 weeks). An outcome of local control or local recurrence of the tumor was assigned to each patient based on a posttherapy follow-up at least 2 years after the end of treatment. Three different supervised classifiers were trained on combinational subsets of the full wavelet and volume feature set. The best-performing linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers each had mean prediction accuracies of 95.7%, with the LDA classifier being more sensitive (100% vs. 80%) and the SVM classifier being more specific (100% vs. 94.4%) in those cases. The K-nearest neighbor classifier performed the best out of all three classifiers, having multiple feature sets that were used to achieve 100% prediction accuracy. The use of distribution measures of the masked wavelet coefficients as features resulted in much better predictive performance than those of previous approaches based on tumor intensity values and their distributions or tumor volume alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19172357      PMCID: PMC3046647          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-009-9179-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  12 in total

1.  Pixel analysis of MR perfusion imaging in predicting radiation therapy outcome in cervical cancer.

Authors:  N A Mayr; W T Yuh; J C Arnholt; J C Ehrhardt; J I Sorosky; V A Magnotta; K S Berbaum; W Zhen; A C Paulino; L W Oberley; A K Sood; J M Buatti
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Correlative study of angiogenesis and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  B Wang; Z Q Gao; X Yan
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Non-invasive methods of assessing angiogenesis and their value in predicting response to treatment in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M L George; A S Dzik-Jurasz; A R Padhani; G Brown; D M Tait; S A Eccles; R I Swift
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Prediction of radiotherapy outcome using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Juliette A Loncaster; Bernadette M Carrington; Johnathan R Sykes; Andrew P Jones; Susan M Todd; Rachel Cooper; David L Buckley; Susan E Davidson; John P Logue; Robin D Hunter; Catharine M L West
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vasculature in benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Edna Furman-Haran; Edna Schechtman; Frederick Kelcz; Kevin Kirshenbaum; Hadassa Degani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in normal and abnormal prostate tissues as defined by biopsy, MRI, and 3D MRSI.

Authors:  S M Noworolski; R G Henry; D B Vigneron; J Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Tumor perfusion studies using fast magnetic resonance imaging technique in advanced cervical cancer: a new noninvasive predictive assay.

Authors:  N A Mayr; W T Yuh; V A Magnotta; J C Ehrhardt; J A Wheeler; J I Sorosky; C S Davis; B C Wen; D D Martin; R E Pelsang; R E Buller; L W Oberley; D E Mellenberg; D H Hussey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patient survival.

Authors:  H Hawighorst; P G Knapstein; M V Knopp; W Weikel; G Brix; I Zuna; S O Schönberg; M Essig; P Vaupel; G van Kaick
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter L Choyke; Andrew J Dwyer; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  The epidemiology of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Eduardo L Franco; Nicolas F Schlecht; Debbie Saslow
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

View more
  6 in total

1.  The biology underlying molecular imaging in oncology: from genome to anatome and back again.

Authors:  R J Gillies; A R Anderson; R A Gatenby; D L Morse
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Mechanistic modelling of dynamic MRI data predicts that tumour heterogeneity decreases therapeutic response.

Authors:  R Venkatasubramanian; R B Arenas; M A Henson; N S Forbes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a review.

Authors:  Xiangyu Yang; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04-26

Review 4.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Texture Analysis as Imaging Biomarker for recurrence in advanced cervical cancer treated with CCRT.

Authors:  Jie Meng; Shunli Liu; Lijing Zhu; Li Zhu; Huanhuan Wang; Li Xie; Yue Guan; Jian He; Xiaofeng Yang; Zhengyang Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Biological Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Petra J van Houdt; Yingli Yang; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.