Literature DB >> 1917233

Who has Pap tests? Variables associated with the use of Pap tests in absence of screening programmes.

G Ronco1, N Segnan, A Ponti.   

Abstract

Characteristics associated with the use of Pap tests were studied in a random sample of 581 women 18-69 years old; residents of Turin, Italy. There has been no organized screening programme in the area. (Tests possibly related to symptoms were not considered). Data were analysed by multiple logistic regression. Some 48% of women had never had a smear. The prevalence of women ever undergoing a Pap test was higher in middle-aged, married and more educated women (p less than 0.001 in all these cases). We found a linear trend (p less than 0.05) related to time since last visit to the family physician. A number of 'preventive' behavioural practices (physical exercise, no alcohol consumption) and experience of early diagnostic procedures for cancer e.g. BSE and mammography, were also associated with ever having had a Pap smear. The prevalence of ever-tested women was significantly lower among lifetime non-smokers than among ex-smokers and current smokers who planned to stop smoking but not lower than in current smokers who did not plan to stop. Results were similar when having had a test within the last three years was taken as the outcome. These results may be useful in planning screening strategies and educational programmes designed to improve attendance in an organized screening programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1917233     DOI: 10.1093/ije/20.2.349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  9 in total

1.  Inequality in health: socioeconomic differentials in mortality in Rome, 1990-95.

Authors:  P Michelozzi; C A Perucci; F Forastiere; D Fusco; C Ancona; V Dell'Orco
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Improvements in preventive care and communication for deaf patients: results of a novel primary health care program.

Authors:  T G MacKinney; D Walters; G L Bird; A B Nattinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Medical risks for women who drink alcohol.

Authors:  K A Bradley; S Badrinath; K Bush; J Boyd-Wickizer; B Anawalt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Determinants of womens participation in cervical cancer screening trial, Maharashtra, India.

Authors:  Bhagwan Nene; Kasturi Jayant; Silvina Arrossi; Surendra Shastri; Atul Budukh; Sanjay Hingmire; Richard Muwonge; Sylla Malvi; Ketayun Dinshaw; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organized screening program: a cross-sectional study of 12,058 Norwegian women.

Authors:  Bo T Hansen; Silje S Hukkelberg; Tor Haldorsen; Tormod Eriksen; Gry B Skare; Mari Nygård
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Impact of opportunistic testing in a systematic cervical cancer screening program: a nationwide registry study.

Authors:  Mette Tranberg; Mette Bach Larsen; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Hans Svanholm; Berit Andersen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Increasing attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme by personal invitation: experience of a Lithuanian primary health care centre.

Authors:  Rūta Kurtinaitienė; Jolita Rimienė; Ingrida Labanauskaitė; Nadežda Lipunova; Giedrė Smailytė
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2016

8.  Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Gudrun Broberg; Jiangrong Wang; Anna-Lena Östberg; Annsofie Adolfsson; Szilard Nemes; Pär Sparén; Björn Strander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do women >or=50 years of age need as much screening as women <50 years after they have had negative screening results?

Authors:  P Armaroli; F Gallo; A Bellomi; S Ciatto; D Consonni; D Davi; P Giorgi-Rossi; A Iossa; E Mancini; C Naldoni; E Polla; G Ronco; M Serafini; V Vergini; L Zanier; M Zappa; N Segnan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.