OBJECTIVES: We examined the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) at 3 US pediatric medical centers, comparing a group of children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with children presenting with chronic constipation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys were administered by postal mail and at pediatric IBD centers in San Francisco, Houston, and Atlanta from 2001 to 2003. A comparison group consisting of pediatric patients with chronic constipation also was surveyed. Data were analyzed by t tests and by exact tests of contingency tables. RESULTS: In all, 236 surveys were collected from the IBD group; 126 surveys were collected from the chronic constipation comparison group. CAM therapies were used by 50% in the IBD group and 23% in the chronic constipation group. The overall regional breakdown of CAM use in IBD revealed no differences, although the types of CAM therapy used varied by site. The most commonly used CAM therapies in the IBD group were spiritual interventions (25%) and nutritional supplements (25%). Positive predictors for CAM use in IBD include the patient's self-reported overall health, an increase in the number of side effects associated with allopathic medications, white ethnicity, and parental education beyond high school. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first US study to characterize CAM use in pediatric patients with IBD with another chronic gastrointestinal disorder. CAM use was twice as common with the IBD group compared with the chronic constipation group. Regional variations exist with the types of CAM therapy used. Practitioners should know that half of their pediatric patients with IBD may be using CAM in conjunction with or as an alternative to other treatments and that certain predictors can help identify those using CAM therapies.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) at 3 US pediatric medical centers, comparing a group of children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with children presenting with chronic constipation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys were administered by postal mail and at pediatric IBD centers in San Francisco, Houston, and Atlanta from 2001 to 2003. A comparison group consisting of pediatric patients with chronic constipation also was surveyed. Data were analyzed by t tests and by exact tests of contingency tables. RESULTS: In all, 236 surveys were collected from the IBD group; 126 surveys were collected from the chronic constipation comparison group. CAM therapies were used by 50% in the IBD group and 23% in the chronic constipation group. The overall regional breakdown of CAM use in IBD revealed no differences, although the types of CAM therapy used varied by site. The most commonly used CAM therapies in the IBD group were spiritual interventions (25%) and nutritional supplements (25%). Positive predictors for CAM use in IBD include the patient's self-reported overall health, an increase in the number of side effects associated with allopathic medications, white ethnicity, and parental education beyond high school. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first US study to characterize CAM use in pediatric patients with IBD with another chronic gastrointestinal disorder. CAM use was twice as common with the IBD group compared with the chronic constipation group. Regional variations exist with the types of CAM therapy used. Practitioners should know that half of their pediatric patients with IBD may be using CAM in conjunction with or as an alternative to other treatments and that certain predictors can help identify those using CAM therapies.
Authors: Jonathan E Markowitz; Petar Mamula; J Fernando delRosario; Robert N Baldassano; James D Lewis; Abbas F Jawad; Keri Culton; Brian L Strom Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: David L Suskind; Ghassan Wahbeh; Stanley A Cohen; Christopher J Damman; Jani Klein; Kim Braly; Michele Shaffer; Dale Lee Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Kimberly Braly; Nila Williamson; Michele L Shaffer; Dale Lee; Ghassan Wahbeh; Jani Klein; Matthew Giefer; David L Suskind Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Sian Cotton; Yvonne Humenay Roberts; Joel Tsevat; Maria T Britto; Paul Succop; Meghan E McGrady; Michael S Yi Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.325