OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of implementation of validated developmental screening by using the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status in 2 urban pediatric practices. DESIGN AND METHODS: We implemented the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status at Boston Children's Hospital Primary Care Center and at Joseph Smith Community Health Center as quality improvement initiatives. Each practice offered screening to all of the patients attending well-child care visits between 6 months and 8 years of age. The implementation process was investigated by using preimplementation and postimplementation surveys and a focus group of pediatric primary care providers. To assess outcomes, such as changes in identification rates and referrals for developmental and behavioral concerns, we reviewed medical charts of all of the 2- and 3-year-olds present at Children's Hospital Primary Care Center well-child care visits in the periods before and after screening implementation. RESULTS: Providers found routine screening easier than expected and feasible to conduct in a busy primary care setting. The practice change resulted in screening of 61.6% of eligible children. Compared with same-aged children before screening, after screening was implemented more behavioral concerns were detected in the 2-year-old group, and more children with developmental concerns were identified in the 3-year-old group. Referral rates for additional evaluation increased only for 3-year-olds, although the types of referrals (ie, audiology and early intervention) were consistent as those found before screening started. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of validated screening by using the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status was feasible in large, urban settings. Effectiveness was demonstrated via chart review documenting an increased rate of identification of developmental and behavioral concerns. Perceived obstacles, such as the time requirement, should not prevent widespread adoption of screening.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of implementation of validated developmental screening by using the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status in 2 urban pediatric practices. DESIGN AND METHODS: We implemented the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status at Boston Children's Hospital Primary Care Center and at Joseph Smith Community Health Center as quality improvement initiatives. Each practice offered screening to all of the patients attending well-child care visits between 6 months and 8 years of age. The implementation process was investigated by using preimplementation and postimplementation surveys and a focus group of pediatric primary care providers. To assess outcomes, such as changes in identification rates and referrals for developmental and behavioral concerns, we reviewed medical charts of all of the 2- and 3-year-olds present at Children's Hospital Primary Care Center well-child care visits in the periods before and after screening implementation. RESULTS: Providers found routine screening easier than expected and feasible to conduct in a busy primary care setting. The practice change resulted in screening of 61.6% of eligible children. Compared with same-aged children before screening, after screening was implemented more behavioral concerns were detected in the 2-year-old group, and more children with developmental concerns were identified in the 3-year-old group. Referral rates for additional evaluation increased only for 3-year-olds, although the types of referrals (ie, audiology and early intervention) were consistent as those found before screening started. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of validated screening by using the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status was feasible in large, urban settings. Effectiveness was demonstrated via chart review documenting an increased rate of identification of developmental and behavioral concerns. Perceived obstacles, such as the time requirement, should not prevent widespread adoption of screening.
Authors: R Christopher Sheldrick; Brandi S Henson; Shela Merchant; Emily N Neger; J Michael Murphy; Ellen C Perrin Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Maarten van 't Hof; Annemyn D Y van Nieuwenhuyzen; Ina van Berckelaer-Onnes; Mathijs Deen; Hans W Hoek; Wietske A Ester Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2021-01-09
Authors: Leandra Godoy; Alice S Carter; Rebecca B Silver; Susan Dickstein; Ronald Seifer Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.225