Literature DB >> 19171003

Reassessment of deferrals for tattooing and piercing.

Mindy Goldman1, Guoliang Xi, Qi-Long Yi, Wenli Fan, Sheila F O'Brien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In August 2005, the Canadian Blood Services decreased the deferral period for tattooing and ear or body piercing from 12 to 6 months. This study assessed the impact of this change on blood safety and availability. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The prevalence of these activities was assessed on an anonymous mail-out survey of 40,000 recent donors. Transmissible disease (TD) marker rates were calculated using the National Epidemiology Donor Database. A case-control study was performed comparing risk factors in TD-positive donors with matched controls. Donor deferral rates were assessed before and after the change in deferral period.
RESULTS: The prevalence rates of tattoo, ear piercing, and body piercing were 13.7, 53.6, and 10.4 percent in survey respondents, respectively, with up to 0.7 percent of activity likely to represent deferrable risk. TD marker rate was low and stable at 21.6 per 100,000 donations before and 19.2 per 100,000 donations after the change in deferral length. Remote tattoo was associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) risk (odds ratio, 5.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.82-16.2), but neither recent tattoo nor piercing was a risk factor for HCV or hepatitis B virus. Shortening of the deferral period reduced deferrals by 20 percent for tattoo and 32 percent for piercing.
CONCLUSION: There was no measurable adverse effect on safety and a positive but less than expected effect on blood availability after shortening the deferral period for tattoo and piercing. The length of other temporary deferrals should be reassessed, since their current contribution to blood safety may be negligible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19171003     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.02037.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  7 in total

Review 1.  Case-control studies in pharmacoeconomic research: an overview.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro; Krista F Huybrechts
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Are donors in Canada compliant with deferral for tattoos and piercing?

Authors:  Sheila F O'brien; Guoliang Xi; Wenli Fan; Qi-Long Yi; Lori Osmond; Gilles Delage; Mindy Goldman
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Accuracy of physician reporting in routine public health surveillance for hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Klaus Jochem; Pascale Leclerc; Emilie Maurais; Claude Tremblay; Joseph Cox
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  Transmission of hepatitis C virus infection through tattooing and piercing: a critical review.

Authors:  Rania A Tohme; Scott D Holmberg
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Dermatological and Ophthalmological Inflammatory, Infectious, and Tumoral Tattoo-Related Reactions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juliana Muñoz-Ortiz; Mariana Teresa Gómez-López; Paula Echeverry-Hernández; Mario Federico Ramos-Santodomingo; Alejandra de-la-Torre
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-05-26

6.  People with multiple tattoos and/or piercings are not at increased risk for HBV or HCV in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Anouk T Urbanus; Anneke van den Hoek; Albert Boonstra; Robin van Houdt; Lotte J de Bruijn; Titia Heijman; Roel A Coutinho; Maria Prins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Surveillance of transfusion-transmissible infections comparison of systems in five developed countries.

Authors:  Sheila F O'Brien; Shimian Zou; Syria Laperche; Lisa J Brant; Clive R Seed; Steven H Kleinman
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2011-09-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.