Literature DB >> 19170291

A comparison of facial and lingual cortical thicknesses in edentulous maxillary and mandibular sites measured on computerized tomograms.

Dennis Flanagan1.   

Abstract

Edentulous ridges suitable for implant treatment depend on cortical bone for implant stability, especially for ridge-expansion procedures. This study was done to find and compare the actual thicknesses of the facial and lingual edentulous cortices of the maxilla and mandible as measured on computerized tomograms. The collected computerized tomographs (CT) of one implantologist's practice (D.F.) were measured. The measurements taken demonstrated that the edentulous lingual cortex is almost always thicker than the facial cortex in the maxilla and mandible. The combined maxillary and mandibular facial cortices measurement sites average was 1.79 mm. The combined maxillary and mandibular lingual cortices measurement sites average was 2.33 mm. The average cortical thickness measurement of the maxillary facial cortices was 1.66 mm. The lingual maxillary average was 2.16 mm. The mandibular facial cortical sites averaged 1.83 mm, while the lingual cortical sites were 2.40 mm. These data confirm that the lingual cortex of the maxilla and mandible is thicker than the facial cortex at a ratio of 1:1.3. This ratio was consistent for maxilla and mandible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19170291     DOI: 10.1563/0.915.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  5 in total

1.  Cortical and cancellous bone thickness on the anterior region of alveolar bone in Korean: a study of dentate human cadavers.

Authors:  Heung-Joong Kim; Sun-Kyoung Yu; Myoung-Hwa Lee; Hoon-Jae Lee; Hee-Jung Kim; Chae-Heon Chung
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  The effectiveness of articaine in mandibular facial infiltrations.

Authors:  Dennis F Flanagan
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2015-12-18

3.  Analysis of potential dynamic concealed factors in the difficulty of lower third molar extraction.

Authors:  P Singh; D-H Ajmera; S-S Xiao; X-Z Yang; X Liu; B Peng
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 4.  Bite force and dental implant treatment: a short review.

Authors:  Dennis Flanagan
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2017-06-27

5.  Image-based Bone Density Classification Using Fractal Dimensions and Histological Analysis of Implant Recipient Site.

Authors:  Elie Hayek; Georges Aoun; Hassem Geha; Ibrahim Nasseh
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2020-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.