Quality-of-care assessment. II. Outpatient medical care following hospital dismissal after myocardial infarction.

This study was undertaken to compare process and outcome methods of quality assessment of medical care in outpatient office practice. Follow-up care after hospitalization for first acute myocardial infarction was used as the model. One hundred fifty-two patients followed up for a minimum of 2 years comprised the study group. An expert committee of cardiologists and internists in community practice established the process criteria for satisfactory care and predicted outcomes of continuing disability and mortality. Using weighted process criteria and a weighted performance index permitted demonstration of a significant association between process items performed at the first posthospitalization visit and 2-year mortality. A significant association could not be demonstrated between later process of care and outcome at 2 years. The outcome assessment study disclosed that predicted disability and mortality rates compared closely with observed outcomes. However, this method for evaluating the quality of outpatient medical care is weakened because little information is available to provide the basis of prediction of satisfactory outcome rates in complicated cases. Although both the process and outcome methods of quality assessment have short comings, the latter method is recommended because satisfactory outcomes is the essential criterion of quality medical care. Moreover, when process items are not specified outcome assessment maintains the flexibility of individual physician practice. Refinement of satisfactory outcome prediction for common illnesses managed in office practice should be the goal for future studies.