Literature DB >> 19169507

[Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of Tecnis ZM900 and Restor SN60D3 diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses].

Wilson Takashi Hida1, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta, Newton Kara-José Júnior, Humberto Costa, Clayton Tokunaga, Livio Neiva Cordeiro, Daniela Gemperli, Celso Takashi Nakano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Comparison of the visual performance and wavefront analysis between patients with Tecnis ZM900 aspheric and AcrySof ReStor SN60D3 spheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL).
METHODS: This prospective comparative study included 78 eyes of 39 patients. The performed ophthalmologic evaluation included near, intermediate and distance corrected and uncorrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity measurement (under photopic and mesopic conditions) and wavefront analysis with the OPD-Scan aberrometrer.
RESULTS: Uncorrected near and distance visual acuity and aberrometry analysis were similar with both intraocular lenses; nevertheless, intermediate visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions were statistically better with Tecnis ZM900.
CONCLUSION: Both studied intraocular lenses promoted excellent near and distance postoperative visual acuity, in high contrast situations. Tecnis ZM900 IOL provided good quality of vision with high contrast condition in low luminosity with reduction in spherical aberration and improvements in intermediate visual acuity when compared to Restor IOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19169507     DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492008000600004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol        ISSN: 0004-2749            Impact factor:   0.872


  5 in total

1.  Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation.

Authors:  Anna Voskresenskaya; Nadezhda Pozdeyeva; Nicolay Pashtaev; Yevgeniy Batkov; Valeriy Treushnicov; Valentin Cherednik
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Contrast visual acuity after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Li; Yi-Fan Feng; Yun-E Zhao; Yin-Ying Zhao; Lei Lin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Visual Performance of Tecnis ZM900 Diffractive Multifocal IOL after 2500 Implants: A 3-Year Followup.

Authors:  Leonardo Akaishi; Rodrigo Vaz; Graziela Vilella; Rodrigo C Garcez; Patrick F Tzelikis
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Visual function and higher order aberration after implantation of aspheric and spherical multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Liu; Fan Zhang; Jiang-Yue Zhao; Li-Wei Ma; Jin-Song Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  André Lins de Medeiros; André Gustavo de Araújo Rolim; Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta; Bruna Vieira Ventura; César Vilar; Mário Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Wilson Takashi Hida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.