Literature DB >> 19169228

Pain relief during panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: a national survey.

C Richardson1, H Waterman.   

Abstract

AIMS: Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for proliferative retinopathy is known to be painful for some people; however, few studies have explored the effects of pain on the procedure within clinical practice.
METHODS: This was a national survey of all Ophthalmic Units within the UK undertaken in late 2006. A questionnaire with 14 questions was developed, piloted, and sent to all NHS units in the UK.
RESULTS: A 77% response rate was achieved. The vast majority of responses (96%) were from doctors. A large proportion (79%) of units see up to 20 cases a week and most patients require up to 5 sessions of PRP. Eighty-eight percent said that the procedure is painful. Once present, pain can affect the number and strength of burns delivered and indirectly increases the number of sessions required to complete the therapy. Sub-tenons anaesthesia was the most commonly used analgesic and there is some tentative evidence to support its effect. Few units have a pre-emptive analgesic protocol. Some respondents were using laser with lower exposure and reported reduced pain.
CONCLUSIONS: PRP is painful; however, most units do not deliver pain relief pre-emptively. There may be a case to support the routine use of sub-tenons anaesthesia until the full effects of new laser techniques become known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19169228     DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Pain score of patients undergoing single spot, short pulse laser versus conventional laser for diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Ahmad Mirshahi; Alireza Lashay; Mehdi Roozbahani; Masoud Aghsaei Fard; Saber Molaie; Meysam Mireshghi; Mohamad Mehdi Zaferani
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Metamizole versus placebo for panretinal photocoagulation pain control: a prospective double-masked randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Rafael Barbosa de Araújo; Leandro Cabral Zacharias; Breno Marques de Azevedo; Beatrice Schmidt Giusti; Rony Carlos Pretti; Walter Y Takahashi; Mário Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2015-11-12

Review 3.  Comparison of Pain Scores Among Patients Undergoing Conventional and Novel Panretinal Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Corrina P Azarcon; Jose Carlo M Artiaga
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.