Literature DB >> 19169103

Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome.

Brian D Solberg1, Charles N Moon, Dennis P Franco, Guy D Paiement.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The use of locked plates in repairing osteopenic 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures remains controversial. The purpose of this article was to report the outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation in low-energy proximal humerus fractures treated with locked plating in patients older than 55 years and stratify risk of failure or complication based on initial radiographic features.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Level I Trauma Center.
METHODS: Seventy patients older than 55 years undergoing locked plate fixation for Neer 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures were studied retrospectively. All patients had standardized, true size digital radiographs of the injured and normal shoulder in the axillary, scapular Y, and 20-degree external rotation views with a minimum of 18 months' clinical follow-up. Two groups were identified based on the initial direction of the humeral head deformity: varus or valgus impaction. There were no statistical differences between treatment groups with regard to age, sex, Neer classification, follow-up, or dislocation. Radiographic measurements included humeral head angulation, tuberosity displacement, and length of the intact metaphyseal segment. Clinical outcomes measured Constant scores (CS) using active range of motion at latest follow-up.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with initial varus fracture patterns healed with an average of 16-degree varus head angulation and an overall CS of 63 at an average of 34 months' follow-up. Forty-six patients with initial valgus fracture patterns healed with an average of 6 degrees of varus angulation and an overall CS of 71 at an average of 37 months' follow-up (P < 0.01). Complications of avascular necrosis, humeral head perforation, loss of fixation, tuberosity displacement >5 mm, and varus subsidence >5 degrees were encountered in 19 of 24 (79%) in the varus group compared with 9 of 46 (19%) in the valgus group (P < 0.01). Final CSs for 3-part fractures were 65 versus 72 (P < 0.01) for varus and valgus groups, respectively, and 61 versus 69 (P = 0.19) for 4-part fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: Neer 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in older patients with initial varus angulation of the humeral head had a significantly worse clinical outcome and higher complication rate than similar fracture patterns with initial valgus angulation. Two factors had significant influence on final outcome in these fracture patterns: initial direction of the humeral head angulation and length of the intact metaphyseal segment attached to the articular fragment. The best clinical outcomes were obtained in valgus impacted fractures with a metaphyseal segment length of greater than 2 mm, and this was independent of Neer fracture type. Humeral head angulation had the greatest effect on final outcomes (P < 0.001), whereas metaphyseal segment length of less than 2 mm was predictive of developing avascular necrosis (P < 0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19169103     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819344bf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  68 in total

1.  Open reduction and internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty in the management of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Robert Thorsness; James Iannuzzi; Katia Noyes; Stephen Kates; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

Review 2.  [Fractures of the humerus head].

Authors:  M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Maier; K Reising; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Classifications in brief: the Neer classification for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Bradley C Carofino; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Mark J Jo; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

Review 5.  [Biomechanics of implant augmentation].

Authors:  M Windolf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly--outcome and complications after locking plate fixation.

Authors:  B Schliemann; J Siemoneit; Ch Theisen; C Kösters; A Weimann; M J Raschke
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-05

7.  Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparative study of functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture.

Authors:  P Baudi; G Campochiaro; F Serafini; G Gazzotti; G Matino; C Rovesta; F Catani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

Review 8.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture.

Authors:  Brandon J Kelly; Chad M Myeroff
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

9.  Open reduction internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Marschall B Berkes; Milton T M Little; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

10.  Three-dimensional analyses of proximal humeral fractures using computed tomography with multiplanar reconstruction: early stability of fixation after osteosynthesis in relation to preoperative bone quality.

Authors:  Koki Ueda; Satoshi Ikemura; Akihisa Yamashita; Takashi Harada; Tetsuya Watanabe; Kenzo Shirasawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.