BACKGROUND: A major question in mammalian sperm chemotaxis is whether the cells sense a chemoattractant gradient by comparing the chemoattractant concentration between time points or between spatial points. METHODS: To resolve this question, we exposed human spermatozoa to a temporal chemoattractant gradient under conditions of no spatial gradient by rapidly mixing the cells with progesterone or bourgeonal on a microscope slide and analyzing their swimming with motion analysis software. RESULTS: The cells responded within seconds with an increase in velocity and lateral head displacement, and with a decrease in the linearity of swimming, becoming hyperactivated at the peak of the response. All the responses were transient, lasting for a number of seconds. Essentially similar results were obtained upon intracellular photorelease of cyclic adenosine monophosphate or cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which are thought to be involved in mediating the chemotactic response. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that human spermatozoa sense and respond to a temporal chemoattractant gradient. On the basis of these observations, we propose a potential model for the chemotactic response of spermatozoa in a spatial chemoattractant gradient.
BACKGROUND: A major question in mammalian sperm chemotaxis is whether the cells sense a chemoattractant gradient by comparing the chemoattractant concentration between time points or between spatial points. METHODS: To resolve this question, we exposed human spermatozoa to a temporal chemoattractant gradient under conditions of no spatial gradient by rapidly mixing the cells with progesterone or bourgeonal on a microscope slide and analyzing their swimming with motion analysis software. RESULTS: The cells responded within seconds with an increase in velocity and lateral head displacement, and with a decrease in the linearity of swimming, becoming hyperactivated at the peak of the response. All the responses were transient, lasting for a number of seconds. Essentially similar results were obtained upon intracellular photorelease of cyclic adenosine monophosphate or cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which are thought to be involved in mediating the chemotactic response. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that human spermatozoa sense and respond to a temporal chemoattractant gradient. On the basis of these observations, we propose a potential model for the chemotactic response of spermatozoa in a spatial chemoattractant gradient.
Authors: Cecilia Soledad Blengini; Maria Eugenia Teves; Diego Rafael Uñates; Héctor Alejandro Guidobaldi; Laura Virginia Gatica; Laura Cecilia Giojalas Journal: Asian J Androl Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 3.285
Authors: Thomas Veitinger; Jeffrey R Riffell; Sophie Veitinger; Jaclyn M Nascimento; Annika Triller; Charlie Chandsawangbhuwana; Katlen Schwane; Andreas Geerts; Frank Wunder; Michael W Berns; Eva M Neuhaus; Richard K Zimmer; Marc Spehr; Hanns Hatt Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Wardah Alasmari; Sarah Costello; Joao Correia; Senga K Oxenham; Jennifer Morris; Leonor Fernandes; Joao Ramalho-Santos; Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Francesco Michelangeli; Stephen Publicover; Christopher L R Barratt Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Wardah Alasmari; Christopher L R Barratt; Stephen J Publicover; Katherine M Whalley; Erica Foster; Vanessa Kay; Sarah Martins da Silva; Senga K Oxenham Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Nachiket D Kashikar; Luis Alvarez; Reinhard Seifert; Ingo Gregor; Oliver Jäckle; Michael Beyermann; Eberhard Krause; U Benjamin Kaupp Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2012-09-17 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Linda Lefièvre; Katherine Nash; Steven Mansell; Sarah Costello; Emma Punt; Joao Correia; Jennifer Morris; Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Stuart M Wilson; Christopher L R Barratt; Stephen Publicover Journal: Biochem J Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 3.857