Literature DB >> 19168573

Do intervention fidelity and dose influence outcomes? Results from the move to improve worksite physical activity program.

Mark G Wilson1, Tania B Basta, Bethany H Bynum, David M DeJoy, Robert J Vandenberg, Rod K Dishman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the implementation of the Move to Improve worksite physical activity program using a four step framework that includes the following: (i) defining the active ingredients, (ii) using good methods to measure implementation, (iii) monitoring implementation and (iv) relating implementation to outcomes. The intervention active ingredients consisted of a goal setting behavior change program, a team competition and environmental supports. Intervention fidelity and dose were measured by surveys administered to site co-ordinators, team captains and employees. Implementation was monitored by the use of biweekly assessments that tracked individual physical activity levels and through weekly reports of the project director and site co-ordinators. Latent growth modeling was conducted to determine whether intervention outcomes were affected by site implementation (i.e. fidelity) and/or participation by employees (i.e. dose). Results showed high levels of intervention fidelity, moderate to high levels of intervention dose delivered and moderate levels of the intervention dose received. Level of implementation affected the degree of change in vigorous physical activity (Mean = 5.4 versus 2.2; chi(2) = 4.9, df = 1), otherwise outcome measures were unaffected by fidelity and dose. These findings suggest that practitioners should focus more energy assuring that the core components are fully implemented and be less concerned about the level of participation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19168573     DOI: 10.1093/her/cyn065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  15 in total

1.  Development of a Wellness Committee Implementation Index for Workplace Health Promotion Programs in Small Businesses.

Authors:  Meagan C Brown; Jeffrey R Harris; Kristen Hammerback; Marlana J Kohn; Amanda T Parrish; Gary K Chan; India J Ornelas; Christian D Helfrich; Peggy A Hannon
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2020-02-20

2.  Participant adherence indicators predict changes in blood pressure, anthropometric measures, and self-reported physical activity in a lifestyle intervention: HUB city steps.

Authors:  Jessica L Thomson; Alicia S Landry; Jamie M Zoellner; Carol Connell; Michael B Madson; Elaine Fontenot Molaison; Kathy Yadrick
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2014-07-01

3.  Effectiveness of a walking group intervention to promote physical activity and cardiovascular health in predominantly non-Hispanic black and Hispanic urban neighborhoods: findings from the walk your heart to health intervention.

Authors:  Amy J Schulz; Barbara A Israel; Graciela B Mentz; Cristina Bernal; Deanna Caver; Ricardo DeMajo; Gregoria Diaz; Cindy Gamboa; Causandra Gaines; Bernadine Hoston; Alisha Opperman; Angela G Reyes; Zachary Rowe; Sharon L Sand; Sachiko Woods
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2015-03-27

4.  Leader Behaviors, Group Cohesion, and Participation in a Walking Group Program.

Authors:  Betty T Izumi; Amy J Schulz; Graciela Mentz; Barbara A Israel; Sharon L Sand; Angela G Reyes; Bernadine Hoston; Dawn Richardson; Cindy Gamboa; Zachary Rowe; Goya Diaz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Implementation of a workplace physical activity intervention in child care: process evaluation results from the Care2BWell trial.

Authors:  Cody D Neshteruk; Erik Willis; Falon Smith; Amber E Vaughn; Anna H Grummon; Maihan B Vu; Dianne S Ward; Laura Linnan
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Do Neighborhood Demographics Modify Walking Group Intervention Effectiveness in Urban Neighborhoods?

Authors:  Amy J Schulz; Graciela B Mentz; Jamila Kwarteng; Barbara A Israel; Cindy Gamboa; Sharon L Sand; Causandra Gaines; Angela G Reyes; Zachary Rowe
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2016-07-09

7.  Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Rosanne LA Freak-Poli; Miranda Cumpston; Loai Albarqouni; Stacy A Clemes; Anna Peeters
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 8.  Understanding for whom, under what conditions, and how group-based physical activity interventions are successful: a realist review.

Authors:  Samantha M Harden; Desmond McEwan; Benjamin D Sylvester; Megan Kaulius; Geralyn Ruissen; Shauna M Burke; Paul A Estabrooks; Mark R Beauchamp
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Moving beyond quantity of participation in process evaluation of an intervention to prevent excessive pregnancy weight gain.

Authors:  Keriann H Paul; Christine M Olson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 10.  What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Debbie Wierenga; Luuk H Engbers; Pepijn Van Empelen; Saskia Duijts; Vincent H Hildebrandt; Willem Van Mechelen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.