Literature DB >> 19167245

Salvage therapy for liver-dominant colorectal metastatic adenocarcinoma: comparison between transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus yttrium-90 radioembolization.

Kelvin Hong1, Jeremy D McBride, Christos S Georgiades, Diane K Reyes, Joseph M Herman, Ihab R Kamel, Jean-François H Geschwind.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare transarterial chemoembolization (CE) versus yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolization (RE) for liver-dominant metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma as salvage therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 36 patients, 21 underwent CE (37 procedures; 11 men; mean age, 67 years; 16 with Child-Pugh class A disease) and 15 underwent (90)Y RE (19 procedures; 11 men; mean age, 64 years; 13 with Child-Pugh class A disease) for liver-dominant colorectal adenocarcinoma. Mean index dominant lesion sizes were 9.3 cm and 8.2 cm in the CE and RE groups, respectively. Multilobar disease was seen in 67% and 87% of the respective groups, and extrahepatic metastases were seen in 43% and 33%, respectively. Mean times from diagnosis of liver metastasis to CE or RE were 17.6 months and 22.6 months, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 37 CE procedures with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and mitomycin were performed, and 19 RE procedures with (90)Y were performed; 43% of patients in the CE group and 20% in the RE group received multiple treatment sessions, and 100% of procedures were technically successful. Median survival times were 7.7 months for the CE group and 6.9 months for the RE group (P = .27). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 43%, 10%, and 0%, respectively, in the CE group; and 34%, 18%, and 0%, respectively, in the RE group. There was one major complication (2.7%) in the CE group (pulmonary embolism), with a 30-day mortality rate of 5.4% (n = 2). There were no major complications in the RE group, with a 30-day mortality rate of 5.2% (n = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unresectable liver colorectal metastases that progress despite systemic chemotherapy can undergo palliative treatment with CE or RE with similar survival benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19167245     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Interventional procedures for hepatic metastases].

Authors:  T Helmberger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Current strategies in interventional oncology of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Christian Marko; Axel Thalhammer; Nour-Eldin Nour-Eldin; Marcel Langenbach; Martin Beeres; Nagy N Naguib; Stephan Zangos; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Early survival prediction after intra-arterial therapies: a 3D quantitative MRI assessment of tumour response after TACE or radioembolization of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver.

Authors:  Julius Chapiro; Rafael Duran; MingDe Lin; Rüdiger Schernthaner; David Lesage; Zhijun Wang; Lynn Jeanette Savic; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Rationale of transcatheter intra-arterial therapies of hepatic cancers.

Authors:  Ryan M Hickey; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 5.  Current role of transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lourens Bester; Baerbel Meteling; David Boshell; Akshat Saxena; David L Morris
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20

Review 6.  A systematic review on the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 radioembolization for unresectable, chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Akshat Saxena; Lourens Bester; Leonard Shan; Marlon Perera; Peter Gibbs; Baerbel Meteling; David L Morris
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Curable metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Eadens; Axel Grothey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Metastatic Liver Disease: Indications for Locoregional Therapy and Supporting Data.

Authors:  Susan Shamimi-Noori; Carin F Gonsalves; Colette M Shaw
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  Incidence and treatment of local site recurrences following RFA of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Karin Nielsen; Aukje A J M van Tilborg; Martijn R Meijerink; Matessa O Macintosh; Babs M Zonderhuis; Elly S M de Lange; Emile F I Comans; Sybren Meijer; M Petrousjka van den Tol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Evidence-based medical oncology and interventional radiology paradigms for liver-dominant colorectal cancer metastases.

Authors:  Alan Alper Sag; Fatih Selcukbiricik; Nil Molinas Mandel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.