Literature DB >> 19166702

Adverse consequences of the 50% misconception.

William B Kannel1, Ramachandran S Vasan.   

Abstract

It is often claimed that only 50% of the incidence of coronary artery disease in the population can be attributed to the standard major risk factors. A careful review of published research demonstrates that 75% to 90% of coronary artery disease incidence in a variety of populations is explained by the standard modifiable risk factors. In conclusion, these data suggest that a more rigorous focus on these conventional risk factors and the lifestyle behaviors that promote them has great potential to reduce the burden of coronary artery disease worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19166702      PMCID: PMC3753109          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

1.  The real contribution of the major risk factors to the coronary epidemics: time to end the "only-50%" myth.

Authors:  P Magnus; R Beaglehole
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001 Dec 10-24

Review 2.  AHA Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: 2002 Update: Consensus Panel Guide to Comprehensive Risk Reduction for Adult Patients Without Coronary or Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases. American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.

Authors:  Thomas A Pearson; Steven N Blair; Stephen R Daniels; Robert H Eckel; Joan M Fair; Stephen P Fortmann; Barry A Franklin; Larry B Goldstein; Philip Greenland; Scott M Grundy; Yuling Hong; Nancy Houston Miller; Ronald M Lauer; Ira S Ockene; Ralph L Sacco; James F Sallis; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone; Kathryn A Taubert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Low risk-factor profile and long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality and life expectancy: findings for 5 large cohorts of young adult and middle-aged men and women.

Authors:  J Stamler; R Stamler; J D Neaton; D Wentworth; M L Daviglus; D Garside; A R Dyer; K Liu; P Greenland
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Differences in coronary heart disease in Framingham, Honolulu and Puerto Rico.

Authors:  T Gordon; M R Garcia-Palmieri; A Kagan; W B Kannel; J Schiffman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1974-09

5.  Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii and California: mortality.

Authors:  R M Worth; H Kato; G G Rhoads; K Kagan; S L Syme
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Contribution of major cardiovascular risk factors to familial premature coronary artery disease: the GENECARD project.

Authors:  Vincent Jomini; Séverine Oppliger-Pasquali; Vincent Wietlisbach; Nicolas Rodondi; Valérie Jotterand; Fred Paccaud; Roger Darioli; Pascal Nicod; Vincent Mooser
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease?

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald; S G Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-05

8.  Trends in mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Europe and other areas of the world.

Authors:  F Levi; F Lucchini; E Negri; C La Vecchia
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Classical risk factors and their impact on incident non-fatal and fatal myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality in southern Germany. Results from the MONICA Augsburg cohort study 1984-1992. Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  U Keil; A D Liese; H W Hense; B Filipiak; A Döring; J Stieber; H Löwel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Umesh N Khot; Monica B Khot; Christopher T Bajzer; Shelly K Sapp; E Magnus Ohman; Sorin J Brener; Stephen G Ellis; A Michael Lincoff; Eric J Topol
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Detecting time-evolving phenotypic topics via tensor factorization on electronic health records: Cardiovascular disease case study.

Authors:  Juan Zhao; Yun Zhang; David J Schlueter; Patrick Wu; Vern Eric Kerchberger; S Trent Rosenbloom; Quinn S Wells; QiPing Feng; Joshua C Denny; Wei-Qi Wei
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Chemical Risk Assessment: Traditional vs Public Health Perspectives.

Authors:  Maureen R Gwinn; Daniel A Axelrad; Tina Bahadori; David Bussard; Wayne E Cascio; Kacee Deener; David Dix; Russell S Thomas; Robert J Kavlock; Thomas A Burke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Genetic cardiovascular risk prediction: will we get there?

Authors:  George Thanassoulis; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Household Air Pollution, Intermediate Outcomes, and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.

Authors:  Mickael Essouma; Jean Joel R Bigna; Jean Jacques N Noubiap
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  A Global View of the Relationships between the Main Behavioural and Clinical Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the GAZEL Prospective Cohort.

Authors:  Pierre Meneton; Cédric Lemogne; Eléonore Herquelot; Sébastien Bonenfant; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Joël Ménard; Marcel Goldberg; Marie Zins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Learning from Longitudinal Data in Electronic Health Record and Genetic Data to Improve Cardiovascular Event Prediction.

Authors:  Juan Zhao; QiPing Feng; Patrick Wu; Roxana A Lupu; Russell A Wilke; Quinn S Wells; Joshua C Denny; Wei-Qi Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.