Literature DB >> 19165818

On the inter-instrument and inter-laboratory transferability of a tandem mass spectral reference library: 1. Results of an Austrian multicenter study.

Herbert Oberacher1, Marion Pavlic, Kathrin Libiseller, Birthe Schubert, Michael Sulyok, Rainer Schuhmacher, Edina Csaszar, Harald C Köfeler.   

Abstract

The inter-instrument and inter-laboratory transferability of a tandem mass spectral reference library originally built on a quadrupole-quadrupole-time-of-flight instrument was examined. The library consisted of 3759 MS/MS spectra collected from 402 reference compounds applying several different collision-energy values for fragmentation. In the course of the multicenter study, 22 test compounds were sent to three different laboratories, where 418 tandem mass spectra were acquired using four different instruments from two manufacturers. The study covered the following types of tandem mass spectrometers: quadrupole-quadrupole-time-of-flight, quadrupole-quadrupole-linear ion trap, quadrupole-quadrupole-quadrupole, and linear ion trap-Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer. In each participating laboratory, optimized instrumental parameters were gathered solely from routinely applied workflows. No standardization procedure was applied to increase the inter-instrument comparability of MS/MS spectra. The acquired tandem mass spectra were matched against the established reference library using a sophisticated matching algorithm, which is presented in detail in a companion paper. Correct answers, meaning that the correct compound was retrieved as top hit, were obtained in 98.1% of cases. For the remaining 1.9% of spectra, the correct compound was matched at second rank. The observed high percentage of correct assignments clearly suggests that the developed mass spectral library search approach is to a large extent platform independent. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19165818     DOI: 10.1002/jms.1545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1076-5174            Impact factor:   1.982


  17 in total

1.  Post-acquisition data processing for the screening of transformation products of different organic contaminants. Two-year monitoring of river water using LC-ESI-QTOF-MS and GCxGC-EI-TOF-MS.

Authors:  S Herrera López; M M Ulaszewska; M D Hernando; M J Martínez Bueno; M J Gómez; A R Fernández-Alba
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Analytical Validation of a Portable Mass Spectrometer Featuring Interchangeable, Ambient Ionization Sources for High Throughput Forensic Evidence Screening.

Authors:  Zachary E Lawton; Angelica Traub; William L Fatigante; Jose Mancias; Adam E O'Leary; Seth E Hall; Jamie R Wieland; Herbert Oberacher; Michael C Gizzi; Christopher C Mulligan
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Metabolite identification and quantitation in LC-MS/MS-based metabolomics.

Authors:  Jun Feng Xiao; Bin Zhou; Habtom W Ressom
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 12.296

4.  Performance evaluation of three liquid chromatography mass spectrometry methods for broad spectrum drug screening.

Authors:  Kara L Lynch; Autumn R Breaud; Hilde Vandenberghe; Alan H B Wu; William Clarke
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Gel-based mass spectrometric analysis of a strongly hydrophobic GABAA-receptor subunit containing four transmembrane domains.

Authors:  Sung-Ung Kang; Karoline Fuchs; Werner Sieghart; Arnold Pollak; Edina Csaszar; Gert Lubec
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Advances in structure elucidation of small molecules using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Bioanal Rev       Date:  2010-08-21

7.  Fast alignment of fragmentation trees.

Authors:  Franziska Hufsky; Kai Dührkop; Florian Rasche; Markus Chimani; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 8.  The importance of mass spectrometric dereplication in fungal secondary metabolite analysis.

Authors:  Kristian F Nielsen; Thomas O Larsen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Computational mass spectrometry for small molecules.

Authors:  Kerstin Scheubert; Franziska Hufsky; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  Fragmentation trees for the structural characterisation of metabolites.

Authors:  Piotr T Kasper; Miguel Rojas-Chertó; Robert Mistrik; Theo Reijmers; Thomas Hankemeier; Rob J Vreeken
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.