Literature DB >> 19165814

Psychometric validity of the Cochlear Implant Function Index (CIFI): a quality of life assessment tool for adult cochlear implant users.

Daniel H Coelho1, Paul E Hammerschlag, Yael Bat-Chava, Darius Kohan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Cochlear Implant Function Index (CIFI) is created to assess adult cochlear implant (CI) auditory effectiveness in real world situations. Our objective is to evaluate the CIFI as a reliable psychometric tool to assess 1) reliance on visual assistance, 2) telephone use, 3) communication at work, 4) 'hearing' in noise, 5) in groups, and 6) in large room settings. STUDY
DESIGN: Based upon Guttman scaling properties, the CIFI elicits implanted respondent's functional level with auditory independence from Level 1 (still requiring signing) to level 4 (without any help beyond CI). A blinded, retrospective questionnaire is anonymously answered by cochlear implant recipients.
SETTING: CI centers of tertiary care medical centers, CI support group, and an interactive web page of a hearing and speech center in a large metropolitan region.
SUBJECTS: 245 respondents from a varied adult CI population implanted for one month to 19 years prior to answering the questionnaire. INTERVENTION: An assessment tool of CI function. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A coefficient of reproducibility (CR) for the Guttman scale format equal or greater than 0.90, indicating good scalability.
RESULTS: CR in the CIFI was above 0.90. Effective scalability and mean scores from 2.5 to 3.5 for the six areas examined (1.00-4.00) were achieved.
CONCLUSION: The psychometric properties of this user friendly survey demonstrate consistently good scalability. Based on these findings, the CIFI provides a validated tool that can be used for systematic comparisons between groups of patients or for follow-up outcomes in patients who use cochlear implants. Further study is indicated to correlate CIFI scores with sound and speech perception scores. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19165814     DOI: 10.1179/cim.2009.10.2.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  4 in total

1.  Use of Adult Patient Focus Groups to Develop the Initial Item Bank for a Cochlear Implant Quality-of-Life Instrument.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Craig A Velozo; Meredith A Holcomb; Elizabeth L Camposeo; Jonathan L Hatch; Ted A Meyer; Paul R Lambert; Cathy L Melvin; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  [Subjective improvement of hearing through cochlear implantation].

Authors:  N Volleth; A Hast; E K Lehmann; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Miryam Calvino; Javier Gavilán; Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado; Rosa M Pérez-Mora; Elena Muñoz; Jesús Díez-Sebastián; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Psychometric properties of the English version of the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ).

Authors:  Jenna Felder; Edda Amann; Ilona Anderson; Joshua Stohl; Mareike Billinger-Finke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.