Literature DB >> 19165077

Cyberknife radiosurgery for benign meningiomas: short-term results in 199 patients.

Federico Colombo1, Leopoldo Casentini, Carlo Cavedon, Paolo Scalchi, Stefania Cora, Paolo Francescon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present initial, short-term results obtained with an image-guided radiosurgery apparatus (CyberKnife; Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) in a series of 199 benign intracranial meningiomas.
METHODS: Selection criteria included lesions unsuitable for surgery and/or remnants after partial surgical removal. All patients were either symptomatic and/or harboring growing tumors. Ninety-nine tumors involved the cavernous sinus; 28 were in the posterior fossa, petrous bone, or clivus; and 29 were in contact with anterior optic pathways. Twenty-two tumors involved the convexity, and 21 involved the falx or tentorium. One hundred fourteen patients had undergone some kind of surgical removal before radiosurgery. Tumor volumes varied from 0.1 to 64 mL (mean, 7.5 mL) and radiation doses ranged from 12 to 25 Gy (mean, 18.5 Gy). Treatment isodoses varied from 70 to 90%. In 150 patients with lesions larger than 8 mL and/or with tumors situated close to critical structures, the dose was delivered in 2 to 5 daily fractions.
RESULTS: The follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 59 months (mean, 30 months; median, 30 months). The tumor volume decreased in 36 patients, was unchanged in 148 patients, and increased in 7 patients. Three patients underwent repeated radiosurgery, and 4 underwent operations. One hundred fifty-four patients were clinically stable. In 30 patients, a significant improvement of clinical symptoms was obtained. In 7 patients, neurological deterioration was observed (new cranial deficits in 2, worsened diplopia in 2, visual field reduction in 2, and worsened headache in 2).
CONCLUSION: The introduction of the CyberKnife extended the indication to 63 patients (>30%) who could not have been treated by single-session radiosurgical techniques. The procedure proved to be safe. Clinical improvement seems to be more frequently observed with the CyberKnife than in our previous linear accelerator experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19165077     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000338947.84636.A6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  31 in total

Review 1.  Update on meningiomas.

Authors:  Santosh Saraf; Bridget J McCarthy; J Lee Villano
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-10-25

2.  Clinical outcomes of perioptic tumors treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using CyberKnife® stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Putipun Puataweepong; Mantana Dhanachai; Ake Hansasuta; Somjai Dangprasert; Chomporn Sitathanee; Rawee Ruangkanchanasetr; Pornpan Yongvithisatid
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy with cyberknife system for meningioma treatment.

Authors:  Rossella Di Franco; Valentina Borzillo; Vincenzo Ravo; Sara Falivene; Francesco Jacopo Romano; Matteo Muto; Fabrizio Cammarota; Giuseppe Totaro; Gianluca Ametrano; Sabrina Rossetti; Carla Cavaliere; Carmine D' Aniello; Gelsomina Iovane; Maria Assunta Porricelli; Massimiliano Berretta; Gerardo Botti; Luigi Starace; Enrico La Salvia; Gaetano Facchini; Paolo Muto
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2017-12-05

Review 4.  Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review.

Authors:  Leland Rogers; Igor Barani; Marc Chamberlain; Thomas J Kaley; Michael McDermott; Jeffrey Raizer; David Schiff; Damien C Weber; Patrick Y Wen; Michael A Vogelbaum
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for WHO grade I meningiomas.

Authors:  Jason P Sheehan; Brian J Williams; Chun Po Yen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Radiosurgical decompression for benign perioptic tumors causing compressive cranial neuropathies: a feasible alternative to microsurgery?

Authors:  Eun Jung Lee; Young Hyun Cho; KyoungJun Yoon; Byungchul Cho; Eun Suk Park; Chang Jin Kim; Sung Woo Roh
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Advances in multidisciplinary therapy for meningiomas.

Authors:  Priscilla K Brastianos; Evanthia Galanis; Nicholas Butowski; Jason W Chan; Ian F Dunn; Roland Goldbrunner; Christel Herold-Mende; Franziska M Ippen; Christian Mawrin; Michael W McDermott; Andrew Sloan; James Snyder; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Marcos Tatagiba; Joerg C Tonn; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth Aldape; Farshad Nassiri; Gelareh Zadeh; Michael D Jenkinson; David R Raleigh
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Is sagittal sinus resection in falcine meningiomas a factor of bad surgical outcome?

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar; Rogério Aires; Marcos Vinicius Calfatt Maldaun; Adriana Tahara; Antonio Marcos de Souza Filho; Carlos Alexandre Zicarelli; Ricardo Ramina
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-10-25

Review 9.  Intracranial meningiomas of atypical (WHO grade II) histology.

Authors:  Leland Rogers; Mark Gilbert; Michael A Vogelbaum
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Giuseppe Minniti; Maurizio Amichetti; Riccardo Maurizi Enrici
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.