Literature DB >> 19164616

Can a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score outperform the original for risk stratifying emergency department patients with chest pain?

R Body1, S Carley, G McDowell, J Ferguson, K Mackway-Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score has been shown to risk stratify patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) effectively in the emergency department (ED) but cannot be used to guide patient disposition. We aimed to evaluate whether modifying the TIMI risk score to give greater weighting to ischaemic ECG changes and troponin elevations would enhance its risk stratification and thus potentially facilitate safe patient discharge after 12-h troponin testing.
METHODS: A prospective diagnostic cohort study was performed within the ED at Manchester Royal Infirmary, a university-affiliated teaching hospital with an annual ED census of approximately 145,000 patients. 804 patients who had presented to the ED with suspected cardiac chest pain were recruited. All patients underwent 12-h troponin T testing and were followed up by telephone and chart review after 30 days for the composite primary outcome of death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or urgent coronary revascularisation.
RESULTS: The modified TIMI risk score outperformed the original (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.87 versus 0.77, p<0.001). Using a cut-off of more than 2 points the score had a sensitivity of 96.4% for the prediction of 30-day events. The specificity of the score was only 51.0%, suggesting that in practice over 40% of patients would be ineligible for discharge even after troponin testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to the TIMI risk score can improve its performance in the risk stratification of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. However, a lack of specificity may still limit its use for guiding patient disposition after troponin testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19164616     DOI: 10.1136/emj.2008.058495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  11 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of the TIMI risk score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; Dipti Agarwal; Subhash Chandra; Mohammed H Murad; Patricia J Erwin; Judd E Hollander; Victor M Montori; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Predictive value of a 4-hour accelerated diagnostic protocol in patients with suspected ischemic chest pain presenting to an emergency department.

Authors:  Mamatha P R Rao; Prashanth Panduranga; Mohammed Al-Mukhaini; Kadhim Sulaiman; Mahmood Al-Jufaili
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2012-05

3.  Discrepancy between clinician and research assistant in TIMI score calculation (TRIAGED CPU).

Authors:  Brian T Taylor; Michelino Mancini
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-11

4.  Comparison of Prediction Between TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) Risk Score and Modified TIMI Risk Score in Discharged Patients From Emergency Department With Atypical Chest Pain.

Authors:  Mohsen Abbasnezhad; Hassan Soleimanpour; Mohamadreza Sasaie; Samad Ej Golzari; Saeid Safari; Maryam Soleimanpour; Robab Mehdizadeh Esfanjani
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule for suspected cardiac chest pain: derivation and external validation.

Authors:  Richard Body; Simon Carley; Garry McDowell; Philip Pemberton; Gillian Burrows; Gary Cook; Philip S Lewis; Alexander Smith; Kevin Mackway-Jones
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  A Multivariate Model for Prediction of Obstructive Coronary Disease in Patients with Acute Chest Pain: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Luis Cláudio Lemos Correia; Maurício Cerqueira; Manuela Carvalhal; Felipe Ferreira; Guilherme Garcia; André Barcelos da Silva; Nicole de Sá; Fernanda Lopes; Ana Clara Barcelos; Márcia Noya-Rabelo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Accuracy of gestalt perception of acute chest pain in predicting coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Cláudio Marcelo Bittencourt das Virgens; Laudenor Lemos; Márcia Noya-Rabelo; Manuela Campelo Carvalhal; Antônio Maurício Dos Santos Cerqueira Junior; Fernanda Oliveira de Andrade Lopes; Nicole Cruz de Sá; Jéssica Gonzalez Suerdieck; Thiago Menezes Barbosa de Souza; Vitor Calixto de Almeida Correia; Gabriella Sant'Ana Sodré; André Barcelos da Silva; Felipe Kalil Beirão Alexandre; Felipe Rodrigues Marques Ferreira; Luís Cláudio Lemos Correia
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-26

8.  Age-sex distribution of patients with high-sensitivity troponin T levels below the 99th percentile.

Authors:  Jie-Yin Liu; Qiao-Wei Jia; Xiao-Ling Zang; Rong-Hu Wang; Chun-Jian Li; Lian-Sheng Wang; Wen-Zhu Ma; Zhi-Jian Yang; En-Zhi Jia
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-18

9.  Anxiety disorders in patients with noncardiac chest pain: association with health-related quality of life and chest pain severity.

Authors:  Stéphanie Hamel; Isabelle Denis; Stéphane Turcotte; Richard Fleet; Patrick Archambault; Clermont E Dionne; Guillaume Foldes-Busque
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Comparison of TIMI and Gensini score in patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain, who underwent coronary angiography.

Authors:  Murat Doğan İşcanlı; Nalan Metin Aksu; Banu Evranos; Kudret Aytemir; Mehmet Mahir Özmen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.