Literature DB >> 19164171

Cell-free extracts from mammalian oocytes partially induce nuclear reprogramming in somatic cells.

Kei Miyamoto1, Tomoyuki Tsukiyama, Yang Yang, Ning Li, Naojiro Minami, Masayasu Yamada, Hiroshi Imai.   

Abstract

Nuclear transfer has been regarded as the only reliable tool for studying nuclear reprogramming of mammalian somatic cells by oocytes. However, nuclear transfer is not well suited for biochemical analyses of the molecular mechanisms of reprogramming. A cell-free system from oocytes is an attractive alternative way to mimic reprogramming in vitro, since a large number of cells can be treated and analyzed. Nevertheless, a cell-free system using oocytes has not been developed in mammals. Here, cell extracts from porcine oocytes were prepared and their ability to induce nuclear reprogramming was evaluated. Extracts from metaphase II (MII) oocytes erased the machinery for regulating gene expression in reversibly permeabilized somatic cells. For example, the extracts caused histone deacetylation and the disappearance of TATA box-binding protein from the nuclei. However, MII-extract-treated cells did not show any obvious changes after cell culture. In contrast, extracts from germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes activated pluripotent marker genes, especially NANOG, and induced partial dedifferentiation after cell culture. The activation of pluripotent marker genes by GV extracts was associated with histone acetylation that was induced during extract treatment. These results indicate that GV- and MII-oocyte extracts have different roles on nuclear reprogramming. Furthermore, both oocyte extracts induced site-specific demethylation in the upstream region of NANOG. These results indicate that cell-free extracts derived from GV- and MII-oocytes could be useful for studying the mechanisms involved in nuclear reprogramming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19164171     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.073676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  28 in total

1.  A role for DNA methylation in regulation of EphA5 receptor expression in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Tihomira D Petkova; Gail M Seigel; Deborah C Otteson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Proteomic analysis of early reprogramming events in murine somatic cells incubated with Xenopus laevis oocyte extracts demonstrates network associations with induced pluripotency markers.

Authors:  Alex J Rathbone; Susan Liddell; Keith H S Campbell
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 3.  Nuclear transfer to eggs and oocytes.

Authors:  J B Gurdon; Ian Wilmut
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Identification and characterization of an oocyte factor required for development of porcine nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  Kei Miyamoto; Kouhei Nagai; Naoya Kitamura; Tomoaki Nishikawa; Haruka Ikegami; Nguyen T Binh; Satoshi Tsukamoto; Mai Matsumoto; Tomoyuki Tsukiyama; Naojiro Minami; Masayasu Yamada; Hiroyoshi Ariga; Masashi Miyake; Tatsuo Kawarasaki; Kazuya Matsumoto; Hiroshi Imai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: Mechanisms, achievements and perspectives in farm animals.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; Thirumala R Talluri; Taruna Anand; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Combined positive effect of oocyte extracts and brilliant cresyl blue stained recipient cytoplasts on epigenetic reprogramming and gene expression in buffalo nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  E M Sadeesh; Shah Fozia; Kataria Meena
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Expression profile of developmentally important genes between hand-made cloned buffalo embryos produced from reprogramming of donor cell with oocytes extract and selection of recipient cytoplast through brilliant cresyl blue staining and in vitro fertilized embryos.

Authors:  Sadeesh Em; Meena Kataria; Balhara S; Ps Yadav
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Epigenetic Modification of Cloned Embryos Improves Nanog Reprogramming in Pigs.

Authors:  Yanjun Huan; Hongmei Wang; Zhanfeng Wu; Jiguang Zhang; Jiang Zhu; Zhonghua Liu; Hongbin He
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.987

9.  A combined epigenetic and non-genetic approach for reprogramming human somatic cells.

Authors:  Jinnuo Han; Perminder S Sachdev; Kuldip S Sidhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identification and characterization of an oocyte factor required for porcine nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Qingran Kong; Bingteng Xie; Jingyu Li; Yanjun Huan; Tianqing Huang; Renyue Wei; Jiawei Lv; Shichao Liu; Zhonghua Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.