Literature DB >> 19164122

Assessing myometrial infiltration by endometrial cancer: uterine virtual navigation with three-dimensional US.

Juan Luis Alcázar1, Rosendo Galván, Sonia Albela, Sergio Martinez, Jaume Pahisa, Matías Jurado, Guillermo López-García.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and analyze the diagnostic performance of uterine virtual navigation with three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography (US) for the assessment of the depth of myometrial infiltration by endometrial cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained; patients gave oral informed consent. Women with endometrial cancer were evaluated by using 3D US prior to surgical staging. A 3D volume of the whole uterus was obtained and analyzed by using software. Virtual navigation through three orthogonal planes was performed to identify the shortest myometrial tumor-free distance to serosa (TDS) by analyzing the lateral, anterior, posterior, and fundal portions of the myometrium. Myometrial infiltration was also assessed by subjective impression of an examiner. Histologic findings of myometrial infiltration and TDS measured by a pathologist were used as the reference standard. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to identify the best cutoff for TDS for identifying myometrial infiltration of 50% or more.
RESULTS: Ninety-six women (mean age, 61.8 years; range, 31-86 years) with endometrial cancer were included in the study. At histologic analysis, myometrial invasion was found to be less than 50% in 69 (72%) cases and 50% or more in 27 (28%) cases. TDS measured with US was positively correlated with histologically measured TDS (r = 0.649; 95% confidence interval: 0.52, 0.76). The best cutoff for US-measured TDS was 9.0 mm (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 61%; negative predictive value, 100%; positive predictive value, 50%). Subjective impression had a sensitivity of 92.6%, a specificity of 82.3%, a negative predictive value of 96.6%, and a positive predictive value of 67.7%.
CONCLUSION: Uterine virtual navigation with 3D US is a reliable method for the assessment of myometrial infiltration in patients with endometrial cancer. RSNA, 2009

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19164122     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2503080877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

Review 1.  Should Endometrial Cancer Treatment Be Centralized?

Authors:  Vincenzo Dario Mandato; Andrea Palicelli; Federica Torricelli; Valentina Mastrofilippo; Chiara Leone; Vittoria Dicarlo; Alessandro Tafuni; Giacomo Santandrea; Gianluca Annunziata; Matteo Generali; Debora Pirillo; Gino Ciarlini; Lorenzo Aguzzoli
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Transvaginal/transrectal ultrasound for assessing myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: a comparison of six different approaches.

Authors:  Juan Luis Alcazar; Laura Pineda; Txanton Martinez-Astorquiza Corral; Rodrigo Orozco; Jesús Utrilla-Layna; Leire Juez; Matías Jurado
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Optimizing the ultrasound visualization of the endometrial-myometrial junction (EMJ).

Authors:  A Votino; T Van den Bosch; A J F Installé; D Van Schoubroeck; J Kaijser; Y Kacem; B De Moor; C Van Pachterbeke; D Timmerman
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2015

Review 4.  What Is the Best Preoperative Imaging for Endometrial Cancer?

Authors:  Ingfrid S Haldorsen; Helga B Salvesen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Subjective Assessment versus Objective Techniques.

Authors:  Filip Frühauf; Michal Zikan; Ivana Semeradova; Pavel Dundr; Kristyna Nemejcova; Ladislav Dusek; David Cibula; Daniela Fischerova
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  MRI-assessed tumor-free distance to serosa predicts deep myometrial invasion and poor outcome in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Julie Andrea Dybvik; Kristine E Fasmer; Sigmund Ytre-Hauge; Jenny Hild Aase Husby; Øyvind O Salvesen; Ingunn Marie Stefansson; Camilla Krakstad; Jone Trovik; Ingfrid S Haldorsen
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-01-08

7.  A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Michael Wong; Tejal Amin; Nikolaos Thanatsis; Joel Naftalin; Davor Jurkovic
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 8.  The Complementary Role of Imaging and Tumor Biomarkerszzm321990in Gynecological Cancers: An Update of the Literature

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Silvia Gigli; Laura Ballesio; Antonio Angeloni; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.