Literature DB >> 19162167

Is there still a need for candidate gene approaches in the era of genome-wide association studies?

Stefan Wilkening1, Bowang Chen, Justo Lorenzo Bermejo, Federico Canzian.   

Abstract

Most genetic variants associated with complex diseases in humans are believed to have a small impact on risk. With traditional candidate gene/pathway approaches several associations with disease risk could be identified. However, now that genome-wide association studies are feasible, the question arises if there is still a need for these approaches. By using HapMap data, we evaluated to which extent commercially available microarrays cover, through linkage disequilibrium, all currently known genes and biological processes in different populations. Furthermore, we estimated the power to detect an association with any specific SNP. Our study shows that coverage of individual genes and pathways by current commercial genotyping platforms is satisfactory for the vast majority of RefSeq gene regions. However, depending on the gene or the population, there may still be a need for candidate gene approaches, especially when looking at polymorphisms with low allele frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19162167     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  28 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary genomics of animal personality.

Authors:  Kees van Oers; Jakob C Mueller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Hypothesis-driven candidate gene association studies: practical design and analytical considerations.

Authors:  Timothy J Jorgensen; Ingo Ruczinski; Bailey Kessing; Michael W Smith; Yin Yao Shugart; Anthony J Alberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Paradigms of Dynamic Control of Thyroid Hormone Signaling.

Authors:  Antonio C Bianco; Alexandra Dumitrescu; Balázs Gereben; Miriam O Ribeiro; Tatiana L Fonseca; Gustavo W Fernandes; Barbara M L C Bocco
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 19.871

4.  The limits of genome-wide methods for pharmacogenomic testing.

Authors:  Eric R Gamazon; Andrew D Skol; Minoli A Perera
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Alterations in sleep, sleep spindle, and EEG power in mGluR5 knockout mice.

Authors:  David D Aguilar; Robert E Strecker; Radhika Basheer; James M McNally
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The genomics of prematurity in an era of more precise clinical phenotyping: A review.

Authors:  Tracy A Manuck
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Relating human genetic variation to variation in drug responses.

Authors:  Ashraf G Madian; Heather E Wheeler; Richard Baker Jones; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Do polymorphisms in chemosensory genes matter for human ingestive behavior?

Authors:  John E Hayes; Emma L Feeney; Alissa L Allen
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.565

9.  Genetic polymorphisms in the androgen metabolism pathway and risk of prostate cancer in low incidence Malaysian ethnic groups.

Authors:  Prevathe Poniah; Zahurin Mohamed; Yamunah Devi Apalasamy; Shamsul Mohd Zain; Shanggar Kuppusamy; Azad Ha Razack
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

10.  A Common DIO2 Polymorphism and Alzheimer Disease Dementia in African and European Americans.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McAninch; Kumar B Rajan; Denis A Evans; Sungro Jo; Layal Chaker; Robin P Peeters; David A Bennett; Deborah C Mash; Antonio C Bianco
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.