Literature DB >> 19162085

Temporal processing of olfactory stimuli during retronasal perception.

Fiona J Wilkes1, David G Laing, Ian Hutchinson, Anthony L Jinks, Erminio Monteleone.   

Abstract

Odorants can be perceived via the nose during an inhalation or sniff (orthonasal perception) and via the mouth, nasopharynx and nasal cavity during mastication or drinking (retronasal perception). Previous data suggest that orthonasal perception provides a more efficient route with greater difficulty being reported when detecting [Halpern BP. Retronasal and orthonasal smelling. Chemosense 2004;6:1-7; Voirol E, Daget N. Comparative study of nasal and retronasal olfactory perception. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft Technol 1986;19:316-9] and identifying [Heilmann S, Hummel T. A new method for comparing orthonasal and retronasal olfaction. Behav Neurosci 2004;118:412-9; Sun BC, Halpern BP. Identification of air-phase retronasal and orthonasal odorant pairs. Chem Senses 2005;30:1-14] single odorants retronasally. Whether the poorer sensitivity obtained via the retronasal route is largely due to the greater adsorption of odorants by the nasopharyngeal mucus compared to the nasal mucus thereby reducing their peak concentration and/or slowing their passage, has not been resolved. Importantly, the question of whether solubility of odorants in mucus or water predicts the outcomes for perception of stimuli presented via the retronasal route has not been resolved. Accordingly, the present study investigates this question by determining whether the solubility of an odorant in mucus predicts which component of a binary odour mixture is perceived first during retronasal perception. The results indicate that solubility in mucus rather than solubility in water is a better predictor of which odour will be perceived first and identified more readily during the retronasal perception of a binary mixture. In addition, lower intensity levels of single odorants occurred via the retronasal route suggesting that adsorption was greater via this route. Whether this was due to nasopharyngeal mucus having a greater adsorptive area or different composition compared to the orthonasal pathway is not known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19162085     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Implausibility of the vibrational theory of olfaction.

Authors:  Eric Block; Seogjoo Jang; Hiroaki Matsunami; Sivakumar Sekharan; Bérénice Dethier; Mehmed Z Ertem; Sivaji Gundala; Yi Pan; Shengju Li; Zhen Li; Stephene N Lodge; Mehmet Ozbil; Huihong Jiang; Sonia F Penalba; Victor S Batista; Hanyi Zhuang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The role of metals in mammalian olfaction of low molecular weight organosulfur compounds.

Authors:  Eric Block; Victor S Batista; Hiroaki Matsunami; Hanyi Zhuang; Lucky Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 13.423

3.  Tuning to odor solubility and sorption pattern in olfactory epithelial responses.

Authors:  John W Scott; Lisa Sherrill; Jianbo Jiang; Kai Zhao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Odor mixture perception during flavor consumption in rats.

Authors:  Brooke A Christensen; Cody S Triplett; Joost X Maier
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.154

5.  Orthonasal versus retronasal glomerular activity in rat olfactory bulb by fMRI.

Authors:  Basavaraju G Sanganahalli; Keeley L Baker; Garth J Thompson; Peter Herman; Gordon M Shepherd; Justus V Verhagen; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 7.400

6.  Glomerular input patterns in the mouse olfactory bulb evoked by retronasal odor stimuli.

Authors:  Yuichi Furudono; Ginny Cruz; Graeme Lowe
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  Genomic approach to explore altered signaling networks of olfaction in response to diesel exhaust particles in mice.

Authors:  Su Ji Kim; Nahyun Kim; So Hyeon Park; Hyun Soo Kim; Jae-Jun Song; Bu-Soon Son; An-Soo Jang; Moo Kyun Park; Young Rok Seo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.