Literature DB >> 19162049

Perseveration and contrast effects in grasping.

Peter Dixon1, Scott Glover.   

Abstract

In order to assess sequential effects in grasping a disc, grip aperture was measured as a function of whether the previous disc was smaller or larger than the current target. In Experiment 1, a biphasic sequential effect was found over the course of the reach: Early in the movement, a contrast effect was observed in which grip aperture was wider following a smaller target; later in the movement, a perseveration effect was observed in which grip aperture was smaller following a smaller target. In Experiment 2, the target was accompanied by context discs that were larger and smaller than the range of target sizes. In this case, there was no contrast effect, and a perseveration effect was observed over the course of the movement trajectory. In a third experiment, a sequential contrast effect was found when subjects did not grasp the disc but merely estimated its size. Our interpretation is that there are two mechanisms producing sequential effects: a perceptual contrast effect in which the target appears larger following a smaller disc, and a motor perseveration effect in which subjects tend to reuse similar motor control parameters from trial to trial. These effects were overlaid in Experiment 1, producing the observed biphasic response. However, in Experiment 2, the context eliminated sequential perceptual contrast, and grip aperture only showed an effect of perseveration. In Experiment 3, only the perceptual effect was found because subjects did not need to grasp the disc.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19162049     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  6 in total

1.  Perseveration effects in reaching and grasping rely on motor priming and not perception.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping an object comfortably: orientation information is held in memory.

Authors:  K Roche; R Verheij; D Voudouris; H Chainay; J B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot.

Authors:  Yuqi Liu; James Caracoglia; Sriparna Sen; Erez Freud; Ella Striem-Amit
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  The endless visuomotor calibration of reach-to-grasp actions.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Impaired Motor Recycling during Action Selection in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Robin Smit; Bastiaan R Bloem; Ivan Toni; Rick C Helmich
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-27

6.  Executive functions in motor imagery: support for the motor-cognitive model over the functional equivalence model.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Elys Bibby; Elsa Tuomi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.