Literature DB >> 19161992

Increased c-fos immunoreactivity in the spinal cord and brain following spinal cord stimulation is frequency-dependent.

Yumi Maeda1, Masahiko Ikeuchi, Paul Wacnik, Kathleen A Sluka.   

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an alternative approach for treatment of neuropathic pain when conservative management is ineffective. Previously we showed both 4 Hz and 60 Hz SCS reduces hyperalgesia in an animal model of neuropathic pain. However, the mechanisms underlying the pain reduction by SCS and how different frequencies of SCS produce the analgesic effect are unclear. To elucidate potential sites modulated by SCS we examined distribution of c-fos in Sprague-Dawley rats with spared nerve injury (SNI) and those without injury in response to SCS. SCS was delivered at one of 3 different frequencies (4 Hz, 60 Hz, and 100 Hz) for 30 min 2 weeks after SNI or in animals without SNI. Animals were perfused either 5 min or 2 h after SCS and c-fos protein examined immunohistochemically. The number of c-fos positive cells significantly increased 5 min (35 min after SCS began) after 4 Hz SCS in the NRM, but not PAG in animals with nerve injury. The number of c-fos positive cells was significantly increased bilaterally 2 h after either 4 Hz or 60 Hz SCS in the spinal cord dorsal horn in the cervical enlargement and under the electrode, but not in the lumbar enlargement in animals with nerve injury. In uninjured animals 4 Hz SCS increased c-fos expression at the electrode site and lumbar enlargement when compared to animals implanted with the electrode who did not receive SCS. 100 Hz SCS had no effect on c-fos expression. Thus, at the time points examined in this model, low frequency SCS likely activates supraspinal and spinal mechanisms to produce analgesia, while higher frequencies activate spinal mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19161992     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  14 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation: neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Yun Guan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

Review 2.  Supraspinal Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Modulation of Pain: Five Decades of Research and Prospects for the Future.

Authors:  Eellan Sivanesan; Dermot P Maher; Srinivasa N Raja; Bengt Linderoth; Yun Guan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Conventional and kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation produces intensity- and frequency-dependent inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Ronen Shechter; Fei Yang; Qian Xu; Yong-Kwan Cheong; Shao-Qiu He; Andrei Sdrulla; Alene F Carteret; Paul W Wacnik; Xinzhong Dong; Richard A Meyer; Srinivasa N Raja; Yun Guan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Promotes Motor Functional Recovery by Enhancing Oligodendrocyte Survival and Differentiation and by Protecting Myelin after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Gang Li; Zhong-Kai Fan; Guang-Fei Gu; Zhi-Qiang Jia; Qiang-Qiang Zhang; Jun-Yu Dai; Shi-Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: evidence and theory for mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Jacob Caylor; Rajiv Reddy; Sopyda Yin; Christina Cui; Mingxiong Huang; Charles Huang; Rao Ramesh; Dewleen G Baker; Alan Simmons; Dmitri Souza; Samer Narouze; Ricardo Vallejo; Imanuel Lerman
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2019-06-28

6.  Tissue Temperature Increases by a 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation System: Phantom and Bioheat Model.

Authors:  Adantchede L Zannou; Niranjan Khadka; Mohamad FallahRad; Dennis Q Truong; Brian H Kopell; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-06-21

Review 7.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrei D Sdrulla; Yun Guan; Srinivasa N Raja
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Chronic spinal cord electrical stimulation protects against 6-hydroxydopamine lesions.

Authors:  Amol P Yadav; Romulo Fuentes; Hao Zhang; Thais Vinholo; Chi-Han Wang; Marco Aurelio M Freire; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treating Chronic Pain: Reviewing Preclinical and Clinical Data on Paresthesia-Free High-Frequency Therapy.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Hira Richter; Paul J Christo; Kayode Williams; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-11-03

10.  Electrical stimulation of dorsal root entry zone attenuates wide-dynamic-range neuronal activity in rats.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Chen Zhang; Qian Xu; Vinod Tiwari; Shao-Qiu He; Yun Wang; Xinzhong Dong; Louis P Vera-Portocarrero; Paul W Wacnik; Srinivasa N Raja; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2014-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.