Literature DB >> 19161689

A comparison of bark and ambrosia beetle communities in two forest types in northern Thailand (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae).

Jiri Hulcr1, Roger A Beaver, Wantanee Puranasakul, Stephanie A Dole, Saowapa Sonthichai.   

Abstract

Many ecological studies of tropical insects are based on small sample sizes or lack sampling scheme rigor, which prevents testing ecological hypotheses and comparing samples from different sites and times. Here we present the results of quantitative trapping of bark and ambrosia beetles over 2 yr at two localities in northern Thailand separated by 5 km, 1,100 m in altitude, and in different forest types. Beetles were collected using a spatially and temporally standardized sampling scheme, followed by a quantitative analysis of community composition and its responses to environmental variables and trapping techniques. In total, 118 species were collected, but the species accumulation curves show little sign of leveling off. Based on slightly different species accumulation rates, the more humid site has a little higher species richness. Species composition was significantly different between the sites, which was not a result of undersampling of rare species. alpha diversity at each site contributes to the regional diversity more than the turnover of species between the sites (beta diversity). Mean annual temperature and humidity have larger effects on the community species composition than seasonal fluctuations of temperature and humidity at each site--beetles do choose their environment but are aseasonal. The site with greater humidity supported significantly more species living in a symbiosis with fungi (ambrosia beetles), whereas the drier and more disturbed site hosted a greater number of circumtropical colonizer species. Each of the different types of trap had a bias for certain taxonomic groups. The results show that even modest samples, if properly structured and analyzed, can answer many ecological questions and can serve in biodiversity comparisons on broad scales.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19161689     DOI: 10.1603/0046-225x-37.6.1461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Entomol        ISSN: 0046-225X            Impact factor:   2.377


  6 in total

1.  Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Bark and Ambrosia Beetles in a Brazilian Tropical Dry Forest.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Macedo-Reis; Samuel Matos Antunes de Novais; Graziela França Monteiro; Carlos Alberto Hector Flechtmann; Maurício Lopes de Faria; Frederico de Siqueira Neves
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.857

2.  The patterns of co-occurrence variation are explained by the low dependence of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) on hosts along altitude gradients.

Authors:  Fang Luo; Ling-Zeng Meng; Jian Wang; Yan-Hong Liu
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Bark and Ambrosia Beetles Show Different Invasion Patterns in the USA.

Authors:  Davide Rassati; Massimo Faccoli; Robert A Haack; Robert J Rabaglia; Edoardo Petrucco Toffolo; Andrea Battisti; Lorenzo Marini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Fine-Scale Vertical Stratification and Guild Composition of Saproxylic Beetles in Lowland and Montane Forests: Similar Patterns despite Low Faunal Overlap.

Authors:  Matthias Weiss; Jiří Procházka; Jiří Schlaghamerský; Lukas Cizek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Positive effects of the catastrophic Hurricane Patricia on insect communities.

Authors:  Samuel Novais; Luiz Eduardo Macedo-Reis; E Jacob Cristobal-Peréz; Gumersindo Sánchez-Montoya; Milan Janda; Frederico Neves; Mauricio Quesada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Species-rich bark and ambrosia beetle fauna (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) of the Ecuadorian Amazonian Forest Canopy.

Authors:  Stephanie A Dole; Jiri Hulcr; Anthony I Cognato
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.