Literature DB >> 19161282

Different intermediate populations formed by tazobactam, sulbactam, and clavulanate reacting with SHV-1 beta-lactamases: Raman crystallographic evidence.

Matthew Kalp1, Monica A Totir, John D Buynak, Paul R Carey.   

Abstract

Tazobactam, sulbactam, and clavulanic acid are the only beta-lactamase inhibitors in clinical use. Comparative inhibitory activities of clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam against clinically important beta-lactamases conclude that tazobactam is superior to both clavulanic acid and sulbactam. Thus far, the majority of explanations for this phenomenon have relied on kinetic studies, which report differences in the ligands' apparent dissociation constants and number of turnovers before inactivation. Due their innate limitations, these investigations do not examine the identity of intermediates on the reaction pathway and relate them to the efficacy of the inhibitors. In the present study, the reactions between the three inhibitors and SHV-1 beta-lactamase have been examined in single crystals using a Raman microscope. The results show that tazobactam forms a predominant population of trans-enamine, a chemically inert species, with SHV-1, while clavulanate and sulbactam form a mixture of trans-enamine and two labile species, the cis-enamine and imine. The same reactions are then reexamined using a deacylation-deficient variant, SHV E166A, that has been used to trap acyl-enzyme intermediates for X-ray crystallographic analysis. Our Raman data show that significant differences exist between the wild-type and SHV E166A acyl-enzyme populations. Namely, compared to SHV-1, sulbactam shows significantly smaller populations of cis-enamine and imine in the E166A variant, while clavulanate exists almost exclusively as trans-enamine in the E166A active site. Using clavulanate as an example, we also show that Raman crystallography can provide novel information on the presence of multiple conformers or tautomers for intermediates within a complex reaction pathway. These insights caution against the interpretation of experimental data obtained with deacylation-deficient beta-lactamases to make mechanistic conclusions about inhibitors within the enzyme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19161282      PMCID: PMC2661619          DOI: 10.1021/ja808311s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  34 in total

Review 1.  Beta-lactamases: a survey of protein diversity.

Authors:  Marion S Helfand; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  Spectroscopic characterization of distortion in enzyme complexes.

Authors:  Paul R Carey
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance: QM/MM modelling of deacylation in a class A beta-lactamase.

Authors:  Johannes C Hermann; Lars Ridder; Hans-Dieter Höltje; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Site-directed mutagenesis of beta-lactamase leading to accumulation of a catalytic intermediate.

Authors:  W A Escobar; A K Tan; A L Fink
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-11-05       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  High resolution crystal structures of the trans-enamine intermediates formed by sulbactam and clavulanic acid and E166A SHV-1 {beta}-lactamase.

Authors:  Pius S Padayatti; Marion S Helfand; Monica A Totir; Marianne P Carey; Paul R Carey; Robert A Bonomo; Focco van den Akker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Ab initio QM/MM study of class A beta-lactamase acylation: dual participation of Glu166 and Lys73 in a concerted base promotion of Ser70.

Authors:  Samy O Meroueh; Jed F Fisher; H Bernhard Schlegel; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Penicillanic acid sulfone: nature of irreversible inactivation of RTEM beta-lactamase from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D G Brenner; J R Knowles
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1984-11-20       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Sulbactam forms only minimal amounts of irreversible acrylate-enzyme with SHV-1 beta-lactamase.

Authors:  Monica A Totir; Marion S Helfand; Marianne P Carey; Anjaneyulu Sheri; John D Buynak; Robert A Bonomo; Paul R Carey
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Following the reactions of mechanism-based inhibitors with beta-lactamase by Raman crystallography.

Authors:  Marion S Helfand; Monica A Totir; Marianne P Carey; Andrea M Hujer; Robert A Bonomo; Paul R Carey
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-11-25       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Penicillanic acid sulfone: an unexpected isotope effect in the interaction of 6 alpha- and 6 beta-monodeuterio and of 6,6-dideuterio derivatives with RTEM beta-lactamase from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D G Brenner; J R Knowles
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1981-06-23       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  18 in total

1.  Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.

Authors:  Thérèse Stachyra; Marie-Claude Péchereau; Jean-Michel Bruneau; Monique Claudon; Jean-Marie Frère; Christine Miossec; Kenneth Coleman; Michael T Black
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  N152G, -S, and -T substitutions in CMY-2 β-lactamase increase catalytic efficiency for cefoxitin and inactivation rates for tazobactam.

Authors:  Marion J Skalweit; Mei Li; Benjamin C Conklin; Magdalena A Taracila; Rebecca A Hutton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The different inhibition mechanisms of OXA-1 and OXA-24 β-lactamases are determined by the stability of active site carboxylated lysine.

Authors:  Tao Che; Christopher R Bethel; Marianne Pusztai-Carey; Robert A Bonomo; Paul R Carey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Identification of products of inhibition of GES-2 beta-lactamase by tazobactam by x-ray crystallography and spectrometry.

Authors:  Hilary Frase; Clyde A Smith; Marta Toth; Matthew M Champion; Shahriar Mobashery; Sergei B Vakulenko
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Carboxylation and decarboxylation of active site Lys 84 controls the activity of OXA-24 β-lactamase of Acinetobacter baumannii: Raman crystallographic and solution evidence.

Authors:  Tao Che; Robert A Bonomo; Sivaprakash Shanmugam; Christopher R Bethel; Marianne Pusztai-Carey; John D Buynak; Paul R Carey
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  β-Lactamase inhibition by 7-alkylidenecephalosporin sulfones: allylic transposition and formation of an unprecedented stabilized acyl-enzyme.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rodkey; David C McLeod; Christopher R Bethel; Kerri M Smith; Yan Xu; Weirui Chai; Tao Che; Paul R Carey; Robert A Bonomo; Focco van den Akker; John D Buynak
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Why tazobactam and sulbactam have different intermediates population with SHV-1 β-lactamase: a molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Rui Li; Yeng-Tseng Wang; Cheng-Lung Chen
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Raman spectra of interchanging β-lactamase inhibitor intermediates on the millisecond time scale.

Authors:  Hossein Heidari Torkabadi; Tao Che; Jingjing Shou; Sivaprakash Shanmugam; Michael W Crowder; Robert A Bonomo; Marianne Pusztai-Carey; Paul R Carey
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Why the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases SHV-2 and SHV-5 are "hypersusceptible" to mechanism-based inhibitors.

Authors:  Matthew Kalp; Christopher R Bethel; Robert A Bonomo; Paul R Carey
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Three decades of beta-lactamase inhibitors.

Authors:  Sarah M Drawz; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.