Literature DB >> 19160735

Evaluation of diagnostic tests.

John M Fardy1.   

Abstract

As technology advances, diagnostic tests continue to improve, and each year, we are presented with new alternatives to the standard procedures. Given the plethora of diagnostic alternatives, diagnostic tests must be evaluated to determine their place in the diagnostic armamentarium. Criteria include sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios for positive and negative tests, and receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of disease influences the diagnostic utility of tests, particularly when diseases are rare or very frequent.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19160735     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-385-1_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  3 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the efficacy of bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  David M DiBardino; Anil Vachani; Lonny Yarmus
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  An Enhanced ELISPOT Assay for Sensitive Detection of Antigen-Specific T Cell Responses to Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Chenggang Jin; Diana R Roen; Paul V Lehmann; Gottfried H Kellermann
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Tumour T1 changes in vivo are highly predictive of response to chemotherapy and reflect the number of viable tumour cells--a preclinical MR study in mice.

Authors:  Claudia Weidensteiner; Peter R Allegrini; Melanie Sticker-Jantscheff; Vincent Romanet; Stephane Ferretti; Paul M J McSheehy
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.