Literature DB >> 19160286

Psychological treatments for the management of irritable bowel syndrome.

Ingeborg L Zijdenbos1, Niek J de Wit, Geert J van der Heijden, Gregory Rubin, A Otto Quartero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists on the optimal treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Psychological treatments are increasingly advocated but their effectiveness is unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: A computer assisted search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was performed for the years 1966-2008. Local databases were searched in Europe. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing single psychological interventions with either usual care or mock interventions in patients over 16 years of age. No language criterion was applied. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The search identified 25 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat (NNT) and standardized mean difference (SMD) along with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model for each outcome. MAIN
RESULTS: Psychological interventions as a group The SMD for symptom score improvement at 2 and 3 months was 0.97 (95% CI 0.29 to 1.65) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.79) respectively compared to usual care. Against placebo, the SMDs were 0.71 (95% CI 0.08 to 1.33) and -0.17 (95% CI -0.45 to 0.11) respectively. For improvement of abdominal pain, the SMDs at 2 and 3 months were 0.54 (95%CI 0.10 to 0.98) and 0.26 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.45) compared to usual care. The SMD from placebo at 3 months was 0.31 (95% CI -0.16 to 0.79). For improvement in quality of life, the SMD from usual care at 2 and 3 months was 0.47 (95%CI 0.11 to 0.84) and 0.31 (95%CI -0.16 to 0.77) respectively. Cognitive behavioural therapy The SMD for symptom score improvement at 2 and 3 months was 0.75 (95% CI -0.20 to 1.70) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.79) respectively compared to usual care. Against placebo, the SMDs were 0.68 (95% CI -0.01 to 1.36) and -0.17 (95% CI -0.45 to 0.11) respectively. For improvement of abdominal pain, the SMDs at 2 and 3 months were 0.45 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.91) and 0.22 (95% CI -0.04 to -0.49) compared to usual care. Against placebo the SMD at 3 months was 0.33 (95% CI -0.16 to 0.82). For improvement in quality of life, the SMDs at 2 and 3 months compared to usual care were 0.44 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.85) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.07 to 1.77) respectively.Interpersonal psychotherapy The RR for adequate relief of symptoms was 2.02 (95% CI 1.13 to 3.62), RD 0.30 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.46), NNT 4 for comparison with care as usual. The SMD for improvement of symptom score was 0.35 (95% CI -0.75 to 0.05) compared with usual care. Relaxation/Stress management The SMD in symptom score improvement at 2 months was 0.50 (95%CI 0.02 to 0.98) compared with usual care. The SMD in improvement of abdominal pain at 3 months was 0.02 (95%CI -0.56 to 0.61) compared with usual care. Long term results Very few long term follow-up results were available. There was no convincing evidence that treatment effects were sustained following completion of treatment for any treatment modality. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Psychological interventions may be slightly superior to usual care or waiting list control conditions at the end of treatment although the clinical significance of this is debatable. Except for a single study, these therapies are not superior to placebo and the sustainability of their effect is questionable. The meta-analysis was significantly limited by issues of validity, heterogeneity, small sample size and outcome definition. Future research should adhere to current recommendations for IBS treatment trials and should focus on the long-term effects of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19160286     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006442.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  59 in total

Review 1.  Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for psychological distress in patients with physical illnesses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew McCombie; Richard Gearry; Jane Andrews; Antonina Mikocka-Walus; Roger Mulder
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Bloating and Abdominal Distension: Old Misconceptions and Current Knowledge.

Authors:  Juan R Malagelada; Anna Accarino; Fernando Azpiroz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Functional bowel disorders in adults.

Authors:  Winfried Häuser; Peter Layer; Peter Henningsen; Wolfgang Kruis
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Current and emerging therapies for the management of functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  Orla F Craig; Eamonn M M Quigley
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Management Strategies for Abdominal Bloating and Distension.

Authors:  Anna Foley; Rebecca Burgell; Jacqueline S Barrett; Peter R Gibson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  Irritable bowel syndrome: common integrative medicine perspectives.

Authors:  Richard Nahas
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 7.  Irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Alexander Charles Ford; Per Olav Vandvik
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-01-06

8.  Measuring acceptance in irritable bowel syndrome: preliminary validation of an adapted scale and construct utility.

Authors:  Nuno Bravo Ferreira; Maria P Eugenicos; Paul Graham Morris; David T Gillanders
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Complementary and alternative medicines in irritable bowel syndrome: an integrative view.

Authors:  Oliver Grundmann; Saunjoo L Yoon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Comprehensive self-management for irritable bowel syndrome: randomized trial of in-person vs. combined in-person and telephone sessions.

Authors:  Monica E Jarrett; Kevin C Cain; Robert L Burr; Vicky L Hertig; Sheldon N Rosen; Margaret M Heitkemper
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.