Literature DB >> 1916019

Synaptic differentiation can be evoked by polymer microbeads that mimic localized pericellular proteolysis by removing proteins from adjacent surfaces.

M J Anderson1, S Champaneria, L E Swenarchuk.   

Abstract

Synaptic differentiation is normally "induced" by regulatory signals that are exchanged only at close contacts between neurites and their predetermined target cells. These signals can, however, be mimicked by contact of either cell with some kinds of polymer microbeads. To find what bead action is responsible for this mimicry, we compared the effects of active and inert microbeads on Xenopus muscle cells developing in culture and on glass-adsorbed films of laminin or fibronectin. Our results show that inductive bioactivity is a property of native polystyrene microbeads that (a) is not dependent merely on bead-muscle adhesion, (b) can be eliminated simply by exposing the beads to inert serum proteins, and (c) correlates closely with the ability of some beads to desorb proteins from adjacent surfaces. Quasi-synaptic differentiation of the muscle surface thus seems to be triggered by the focal removal of peripheral cell surface components, rather than by direct bead interactions with membrane receptors or ion channels or their gradual acquisition of endogenous regulatory substances. Since nerve-muscle interaction also causes an elimination of extracellular matrix proteins from the muscle surface, very early in synapse development, we consider the possibility that the extracellular degradation of peripheral surface components contributes to the transmission of inductive positional signals during synaptogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1916019     DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(91)90305-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  8 in total

1.  Synapse-forming axons and recombinant agrin induce microprocess formation on myotubes.

Authors:  C S Uhm; B Neuhuber; B Lowe; V Crocker; M P Daniels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Proteolytic disruption of laminin-integrin complexes on muscle cells during synapse formation.

Authors:  M J Anderson; Z Q Shi; S L Zackson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Intercellular communication that mediates formation of the neuromuscular junction.

Authors:  M P Daniels
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Muscle-specific trk-related receptor with a kringle domain defines a distinct class of receptor tyrosine kinases.

Authors:  C G Jennings; S M Dyer; S J Burden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Synaptic functions of invertebrate varicosities: what molecular mechanisms lie beneath.

Authors:  Carlo Natale Giuseppe Giachello; Pier Giorgio Montarolo; Mirella Ghirardi
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 6.  Nerve, Muscle, and Synaptogenesis.

Authors:  Lauren Eric Swenarchuk
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Tyrosine phosphorylation and acetylcholine receptor cluster formation in cultured Xenopus muscle cells.

Authors:  L P Baker; H B Peng
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  A role of tyrosine phosphorylation in the formation of acetylcholine receptor clusters induced by electric fields in cultured Xenopus muscle cells.

Authors:  H B Peng; L P Baker; Z Dai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.539

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.