Literature DB >> 19160156

Beyond NOTES: randomized controlled study of different methods of flexible endoscopic hemostasis of artificially induced hemorrhage, via NOTES access to the peritoneal cavity.

A Fritscher-Ravens1, A Ghanbari, C Holland, F Olagbeye, K G Hardeler, F Seehusen, B Jacobsen, K Mannur.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Significant hemorrhage is a likely complication during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures. We tested three different prototype devices (involving endoscopic suturing, monopolar forceps, and forced argon plasma coagulation [FAPC]) for treatment of acute bleeding in a survival animal model.
METHOD: Using transgastric access (TGA) or transvaginal access (TVA), the endoscope was introduced into the peritoneal cavity and the first side-branch of the gastroepiploic artery (1aGE) was cut before the different hemostatic methods were applied.
RESULTS: Sutures could not be placed quickly enough before vision was inhibited. With monopolar forceps via TGA, the time to control bleeding was 10 - 140 s (mean 58 +/- 41 s) and with TVA it was 25 - 115 s (mean 57 +/- 26 s) (P = 0.54). It was not possible to stop the bleeding in 4/6 animals with TGA access and in 3/6 with TVA, and FAPC was needed to entirely stop it, taking a further 10 - 280 s (TGA mean 126 +/- 90 s, 34 - 242 s; TVA mean 152 +/- 61 s; P = 0.42). Using FAPC with TGA took 4 - 72 s (mean 28 +/- 20 s) to stop the bleeding, and 16 - 41 s (mean 24 +/- 9.4 s) with TVA ( P = 0.64). As the FAPC technique was relatively so much better, additional treatment of bleeding from the main gastroepiploic artery (aGe) was added in four cases for each method of access; this was successful but took significantly longer, with TGA at 10 - 260 s and with TVA at 30 - 172 s (means 98 +/- 82, 117 +/- 54 s, respectively; not significant).
CONCLUSION: Regarding the three methods tested, the new prototype FAPC device allowed hemostasis of notable bleeding from a major vessel even more quickly than forceps coagulation of a bleeding side branch. More studies are needed to further explore this potentially very valuable tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19160156     DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1103487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  7 in total

1.  Natural orifice transesophageal thoracoscopic surgery: A review of the current state.

Authors:  Brian G Turner; Denise W Gee
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-01-16

2.  Risk of infection after iatrogenic perforation of the gut wall? Evaluation of preventive strategies in a randomized controlled animal trial.

Authors:  Mark Ellrichmann; Shantiswaroop Dhar; Klaus-Gerd Hadeler; Frauke Seehusen; Tamzin Cuming; Andrea T Feßler; Heiner Niemann; Stefan Schwarz; Annette Fritscher-Ravens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Current progress on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Junqing Wang; Lu Zhang; Weize Wu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Randomized comparative trial of a novel one-step needle sphincterotome versus direct incision and balloon dilation used to create gastrotomies for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in the porcine model.

Authors:  Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; James Yun Wong Lau; Enders Kwok Wai Ng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Critical analysis of hot topics in NOTES.

Authors:  Mouen A Khashab; Anthony N Kalloo
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Management of intraoperative hemorrhage during NOTES: a prospective, randomized comparison.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Stephen M Plachta; Nathaniel J Soper; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Current developments in natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; Enders Kwok Wai Ng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.