Literature DB >> 19159636

Is family special to the brain? An event-related fMRI study of familiar, familial, and self-face recognition.

Steven M Platek1, Shelly M Kemp.   

Abstract

The face-processing network has evolved to respond differentially to different classes of faces depending on their relevance to the perceiver. For example, self-, familiar, and unknown faces are associated with activation in different neural substrates. Family should represent a special class of face stimuli that is of high relevance to individuals, because incorrect assignment of kinship can have dire consequences (e.g., incest, cuckoldry). Therefore evolution should have favored redundant mechanisms for detection of kin. We used fMRI to investigate the neural substrates associated with viewing faces of kin compared to other classes of faces (e.g., self-face, familiar face, and unknown face), and to examine the degree to which self-facial resemblance activated similar neural substrates. Contrasting kin faces with unknown faces activated substrates associated with self-face recognition, while comparing kin faces to friend faces activated posterior cingulate and cuneus. Similar posterior medial substrates were recruited when contrasting self-resembling faces with morphed faces of kin, suggesting these regions potentially represent computational processing about facial familiarity and identity. On the other hand, discrimination of self-resembling faces from familiar morphs activated anterior medial substrates (anterior cingulate cortex, ACC, medial prefrontal cortex, MPFC). These findings, and a region of interest (ROI) analysis, highlight the role of the extended face-processing network for discrimination of kin from familiar non-kin members of one's social group based on self-referent phenotypic cues.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19159636     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  43 in total

1.  Differential neural activity and connectivity for processing one's own face: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Svetlana Masalovich; Ismael Gaxiola; Scott Peltier; Paul E Holtzheimer; Christine Heim; Bradley Goodyear; Glenda Macqueen; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  Regional gray matter correlates of perceived emotional intelligence.

Authors:  Nancy S Koven; Robert M Roth; Matthew A Garlinghouse; Laura A Flashman; Andrew J Saykin
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Neural microgenesis of personally familiar face recognition.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Luca Vizioli; Joan Liu-Shuang; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Self-face advantage over familiar and unfamiliar faces: A three-level meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  Catherine Bortolon; Stéphane Raffard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

5.  Neural representations of close others in collectivistic brains.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Lihua Mao; Yina Ma; Xuedong Yang; Jingqian Cao; Xi Liu; Jinzhao Wang; Xiaoying Wang; Shihui Han
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Functional dissociation of the left and right fusiform gyrus in self-face recognition.

Authors:  Yina Ma; Shihui Han
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Different neural pathways linking personality traits and eudaimonic well-being: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Feng Kong; Ling Liu; Xu Wang; Siyuan Hu; Yiying Song; Jia Liu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Self-face recognition in social context.

Authors:  Motoaki Sugiura; Yuko Sassa; Hyeonjeong Jeong; Keisuke Wakusawa; Kaoru Horie; Shigeru Sato; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  When BOLD is thicker than water: processing social information about kin and friends at different levels of the social network.

Authors:  Rafael Wlodarski; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men.

Authors:  Steven M Platek; Devendra Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.