Literature DB >> 19159381

Non-invasive evaluation techniques to quantify the efficacy of cosmetic anti-cellulite products.

Stephan Bielfeldt1, Peter Buttgereit, Marianne Brandt, Gunja Springmann, Klaus-Peter Wilhelm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of women suffer from the unattractive sight of dimpling skin on the thighs and buttocks, globally known as cellulite. Cellulite can be regarded as the most investigated non-disease, because, from the cosmetic viewpoint, most women desire a reduction in cellulite severity. Despite investigations made, cellulite is still not well understood at the cellular level, which leads to controversy regarding the investigative methods for cellulite reduction as well as the development of products to treat cellulite skin.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our work was to improve the set up of macrophotography for making images of dimpled skin and to automatize image analysis of 20 MHz ultrasound imaging - these two methods being just two of a variety of available methods for investigating cellulite skin.
METHODS: Macrophotography was standardized on the aspects of volunteer's positioning, skin illumination, background used, and camera position. It was performed before, during and after a 3-month-treatment of a cosmetic product. Scoring assessments of the generated images were made by the volunteers themselves as well as by six trained experts. Ultrasound imaging was performed at the baseline visit in order to correlate the newly developed analysis with the visually rated cellulite score. A second study is also presented showing a variety of parameters that can be used for cosmetic testing of cellulite products: skin firmness, blood circulation and circumferential thigh measurements.
RESULTS: Standardization of macrophotography minimized differences in image features between assessment times, therefore, enabling follow-up rating assessments of the images. A custom-made rating program simplified the scoring procedure by presenting images as blind and randomized, and by implementing computer-based analysis using an online rating scale. Volunteers and experts scored significant improvement of skin appearance over the course of a 3-month cosmetic treatment. Image analysis of ultrasound imaging was automatized, and a modification of the commonly known roughness parameter Ra was implemented to characterize cellulite severity. Comparison with the visually rated cellulite score showed an existing correlation between the score and the modified parameter Ra(m). Further parameters investigated in an exemplary study, as mentioned above, demonstrated a significant improvement of skin appearance after treatment with a cosmetic product.
CONCLUSIONS: Macrophotography and ultrasound imaging can be regarded as important tools for determining and quantifying the aspects of cellulite. With a gold standard missing for investigating cellulite severity, these two methods may not determine cellulite at the cellular level, but they do characterize the skin appearance so typical for cellulite. Combined with a variety of other methods, macrophotography and ultrasound imaging can very well define cellulite-reducing efficacy from the cosmetic point of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19159381     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00300.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Res Technol        ISSN: 0909-752X            Impact factor:   2.365


  12 in total

1.  Efficacy of Slimming Cream Containing 3.5% Water-Soluble Caffeine and Xanthenes for the Treatment of Cellulite: Clinical Study and Literature Review.

Authors:  Sang-Young Byun; Soon-Hyo Kwon; Su-Hak Heo; Jae-Seong Shim; Mi-Hee Du; Jung-Im Na
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Ultrasound and 3D Skin Imaging: Methods to Evaluate Efficacy of Striae Distensae Treatment.

Authors:  Mariella Bleve; Priscilla Capra; Franca Pavanetto; Paola Perugini
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2011-11-22

3.  Intensive treatment of cellulite based on physiopathological principles.

Authors:  José Maria Pereira de Godoy; Mayra Yara Groggia; Lucilene Ferro Laks; Maria de Fátima Guerreiro de Godoy
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2012-05-14

4.  Pilot study of histology aspect of cellulite in seventy patients who differ in BMI and cellulite grading.

Authors:  Antonio Scarano; Morena Petrini; Andrea Sbarbati; Roberto Amore; Eugenio Luigi Iorio; Marco Marchetti; Domenico Amuso
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.189

5.  Longitudinal evaluation of manual lymphatic drainage for the treatment of gynoid lipodystrophy.

Authors:  Bianca Schonvvetter; Juliana Laudicéia Marques Soares; Ediléia Bagatin
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.896

Review 6.  Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision.

Authors:  Daniel P Friedmann; Garrett Lane Vick; Vineet Mishra
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2017-01-07

7.  Synergistic effects of Combined Therapy: nonfocused ultrasound plus Aussie current for noninvasive body contouring.

Authors:  Vivianne Carvalho Canela; Cinthia Nicoletti Crivelaro; Luciane Zacchi Ferla; Gisele Marques Pelozo; Juliana Azevedo; Richard Eloin Liebano; Caroline Nogueira; Renata Michelini Guidi; Clóvis Grecco; Estela Sant'Ana
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2018-04-27

8.  Cellulite Reduction by Modified Thai Herbal Compresses; A Randomized Double-Blind Trial.

Authors:  Ngamrayu Ngamdokmai; Neti Waranuch; Krongkarn Chootip; Katechan Jampachaisri; C Norman Scholfield; Kornkanok Ingkaninan
Journal:  J Evid Based Integr Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec

Review 9.  Assessment of non-invasive techniques and herbal-based products on dermatological physiology and intercellular lipid properties.

Authors:  Nor Hazwani Mohd Ariffin; Rosnani Hasham
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-05-25

10.  Objective and subjective reduction of cellulite volume using a localized vibrational massage device in a 24-week randomized intra-individual single-blind regression study.

Authors:  T Sadowski; S Bielfeldt; K-P Wilhelm; S Sukopp; C Gordon
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.