Literature DB >> 19158524

The subcutaneous cervicofacial flap revisited.

William G Austen1, Brian M Parrett, Amir Taghinia, Sean F Wolfort, Joseph Upton.   

Abstract

The cervicofacial flap has been the reconstruction of choice for midface soft tissue defects for over 30 years. Deep plane dissection has been advocated to decrease complication rates and improve results. However, the subcutaneous approach is still widely used. Over a 20-year period, we reviewed all patients who underwent subcutaneous cervicofacial flaps for cheek defects to analyze complications and results.Thirty-two patients (mean age, 71 years) underwent 32 subcutaneous cervicofacial flaps for cheek reconstruction after Mohs micrographic excision of skin cancer. The mean defect size was 7.2 x 5.8 cm. Mean follow-up was 32 months. Only 3 of 32 patients (9%) had minor flap tip or edge necrosis, all managed without further surgery. One patient (3%) had minor long-term ectropion with upward gaze and 31 of 32 patients were happy with their results.The subcutaneous rotation-advancement cervicofacial flap remains an excellent choice for cheek reconstruction with comparable tip necrosis rates and likely lower ectropion rates when compared with the deep plane technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19158524     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819354f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  8 in total

1.  The faciocervicopectoral flap for non-oncological cases of cheek reconstruction.

Authors:  R M Makkar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Cervicofacial Flap: Can We Save Patient's Sideburns?

Authors:  Dong Seob Lim; Do Heon Lee; Seong Hwan Kim; Kyung Pil Kim; Jae Ha Hwang; Kwang Seog Kim; Sam Yong Lee
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-09-26

3.  Cheek rotation flap reconstruction--an anthropometric appraisal of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Gregor F Raschke; Ulrich M Rieger; Rolf-Dieter Bader; Arndt Guentsch; Oliver Schaefer; Stefan Elstner; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The versatile application of cervicofacial and cervicothoracic rotation flaps in head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Fa-yu Liu; Zhong-fei Xu; Peng Li; Chang-fu Sun; Rui-wu Li; Shu-fen Ge; Jun-lin Li; Shao-hui Huang; Xuexin Tan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Reconstruction of periorbital defects using a modified Tenzel flap.

Authors:  Jin An Cha; Kyung Ah Lee
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-20

6.  Reconstructing zone 1 cheek defects.

Authors:  Mark Nicolau; Mark S Granick
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-01-28

7.  Control of the Suborbital Cheek in Pediatric Patients: Working in the Deep Plane.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Barry M Zide
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-11-27

8.  A Method to Reproduce Symmetry in Midfacial Reconstruction: A Report of 19 Cases.

Authors:  Xiaoli Lou; Chunyu Xue; Joseph A Molnar; Hongda Bi
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.