Literature DB >> 19157348

Antibacterial activity of epidural infusions.

M W Coghlan1, M J Davies, C Hoyt, L Joyce, R Kilner, M J Waters.   

Abstract

The incidence of epidural abscess following epidural catheterisation appears to be increasing, being recently reported as one in 1000 among surgical patients. This study was designed to investigate the antibacterial activity of various local anaesthetics and additives, used in epidural infusions, against a range of micro-organisms associated with epidural abscess. The aim was to determine which, if any, epidural infusion solution has the greatest antibacterial activity. Bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine crystals were dissolved and added to Mueller-Hinton Agar in concentrations of 0.06%, 0.125%, 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.5% and 1%. Fentanyl, adrenaline and clonidine were also mixed with agar in isolation and in combination with the local anaesthetics. Using a reference agar dilution method, the minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined for a range of bacteria. Bupivacaine showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli with minimum inhibitory concentrations between 0.125% and 0.25%. It did not inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at any of the concentrations tested. Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine showed no activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, even at the highest concentrations tested, and minimal activity against Escherichia coli (minimum inhibitory concentrations 0.5% and 1% respectively). The presence of fentanyl, adrenaline and clonidine had no additional effect on the antibacterial activity of any of the local anaesthetic agents. The low concentrations of local anaesthetic usually used in epidural infusions have minimal antibacterial activity. While the clinical implications of this in vitro study are not known, consideration should be given to increasing the concentration of bupivacaine in an epidural infusion or to administering a daily bolus of 0.25% bupivacaine to reduce the risk of epidural bacterial growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19157348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Update on the pharmacology and effects of local anesthetics].

Authors:  J Ahrens; A Leffler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Bacterial inhibition efficiency of prilocaine and bupivacaine.

Authors:  Sevgi Kesici; Mehmet Demirci; Ugur Kesici
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  New formulations of local anaesthetics-part I.

Authors:  Edward A Shipton
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-12-05

4.  Physiological and pharmacologic aspects of peripheral nerve blocks.

Authors:  Prasanna Vadhanan; Debendra Kumar Tripaty; S Adinarayanan
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

5.  Epidural infections, bacteriostatic drug effects and technical strategies for prevention.

Authors:  Joerg Bruenke; Thomas Riemann; Paul Kessler; Norman Kachel
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 6.288

6.  [Antimicrobial effects of fentanyl and bupivacaine].

Authors:  Sevgi Kesici; Mehmet Demırci; Ugur Kesici
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-07-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.