Literature DB >> 19156920

Computed tomography scan-driven selection of treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma histologic subtypes.

Guy Lahat1, John E Madewell, Daniel A Anaya, Wei Qiao, Daniel Tuvin, Robert S Benjamin, Dina C Lev, Ralphael E Pollock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well differentiated (WD) and dedifferentiated (DD) retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) have distinct biologic behaviors. Consequently, the therapeutic approaches for these tumors differ and mandate an accurate preoperative diagnosis. The authors of this report evaluated whether computed tomography (CT) can be used to differentiate between WD and DD RPLS.
METHODS: Imaging studies (CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-CT) from 78 patients with RPLS who underwent surgery at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC) between 2001 and 2007 were reviewed by a senior bone and soft tissue sarcoma radiologist who was blinded to the final histopathologic diagnosis. A focal nodular/water density area within an RPLS was interpreted as a marker suggestive of DD. Correlations between imaging diagnosis, histology, and clinical outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: The study radiologist identified 60 RPLS as DD and 17 RPLS as WD. A radiologic diagnosis of a WD was correlated with preoperative biopsy and postoperative histology in all patients (100%). Focal nodular/water density was a very sensitive marker of DD (97.8%); however, it had relatively low specificity (51.5%). Sixteen WD RPLS (48.5%) contained focal nodular/water density areas, leading to their misdiagnosis as DD; half of those tumors had hypercellular WD. Of 78 preoperative biopsies, 22 (28.2%) were performed at UTMDACC under CT guidance. Preoperative histologic diagnoses obtained from 12 biopsies derived from focal nodular/water density areas were confirmed as unchanged on final pathology; whereas, in 50% of biopsies that were not taken from a suspicious area, DD histology was misdiagnosed as WD.
CONCLUSIONS: When CT features are suggestive of WD, no further diagnostic tests are needed for tumor characterization. Moreover, CT can accurately identify most DD, thereby rendering their under-treatment unlikely; however, a CT-guided biopsy is needed to differentiate between DD and WD RPLS that contain focal nodular/water density areas, thereby avoiding their over treatment. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19156920     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  21 in total

Review 1.  Clinicopathological characteristics and experience in the treatment of giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Xiangyu Zeng; Weizhen Liu; Xiuli Wu; Jinbo Gao; Peng Zhang; Xiaoming Shuai; Kaixiong Tao
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.742

2.  Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Diagnostic approach to primary retroperitoneal pathologies: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Ferenc Czeyda-Pommersheim; Christine Menias; Annemarie Boustani; Margarita Revzin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-17

4.  Management of high-grade retroperitoneal liposarcomas: personal experience.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Luigi Sossio Pezzullo; Giuseppe Salvatore; Martina Gilda Pezzullo; Maddalena Leongito; Ida Esposito; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-04-01

Review 5.  Contemporary Management of Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

Authors:  Yuliya Olimpiadi; Suisui Song; James S Hu; George R Matcuk; Shefali Chopra; Burton L Eisenberg; Stephen F Sener; William W Tseng
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Surgical management of retroperitoneal and pelvic sarcomas.

Authors:  Marcus C B Tan; Sam S Yoon
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Giant liposarcoma of the back with 4 types of histopathology: a case report.

Authors:  Panoraia Paraskeva; Paraskevas Katsaronis; Eleftherios D Spartalis; Andreas C Lazaris; Hara Gakiopoulou; Panagiotis Mallis; Periklis Tomos
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-12-16

8.  Can Abdominal Computed Tomography Imaging Help Accurately Identify a Dedifferentiated Component in a Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma?

Authors:  Priya Bhosale; Jieqi Wang; Datla Varma; Corey Jensen; Madhavi Patnana; Wei Wei; Anil Chauhan; Barry Feig; Shreyaskumar Patel; Neeta Somaiah; Tara Sagebiel
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 9.  Surgery for Abdominal Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma.

Authors:  Sara A Mansfield; Raphael E Pollock; Valerie P Grignol
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-01-16

10.  Characteristics and computed tomography evaluation of primary retroperitoneal tumours: report of 113 cases.

Authors:  W Cheng; Y Qi; B Wang; L Tian; W Huang; Y Chen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.