Literature DB >> 19156902

Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 10 and CYP2C19 2, 3 are not associated with prognosis, endometrial thickness, or bone mineral density in Japanese breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.

Masatsugu Okishiro1, Tetsuya Taguchi, Seung Jin Kim, Kenzo Shimazu, Yasuhiro Tamaki, Shinzaburo Noguchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated the impact of the genetic polymorphisms cytochrome P450 (CYP) family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 6, allele 10 (CYP2D6 10) and CYP family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 19, allele 2, 3 (CYP2C19 2, 3) on disease recurrence in patients with breast cancer who received adjuvant tamoxifen and evaluated the impact of those polymorphisms on endometrial thickness, bone mineral density (BMD), and serum total cholesterol levels.
METHODS: Patients with primary breast cancer (n=173) who had hormone receptor-positive tumors and who also received adjuvant tamoxifen were included in the current study. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 10 and CYP2C19 2, 3 were analyzed.
RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates did not differ significantly between patients with the CYP2D6 10/10 genotype (n=40) and patients with the CYP2D6 wild-type (wt)/wt or wt/10 genotype (n=133) or between patients with the CYP2C19 2/2, 2/3, or 3/3 genotypes (n=41) and patients with the CYP2C19 wt/wt, wt/2, or wt/3 genotype (n=132). Multivariate analysis indicated that, even after adjustment for well established prognostic factors, these CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 genotypes were not associated significantly with the RFS rate. Moreover, these genotypes did not affect endometrial thickness, BMD, or total cholesterol levels 1 year after the start of tamoxifen treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither the CYP2D6 10/10 genotype nor the CYP2C19 genotype is likely to have a clinically significant impact on prognosis, endometrial thickness, BMD, or total cholesterol levels in Japanese patients with breast cancer who are treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19156902     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  46 in total

Review 1.  Part 2: pharmacogenetic variability in drug transport and phase I anticancer drug metabolism.

Authors:  Maarten J Deenen; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 2.  Association between HSD17B1 rs605059 polymorphisms and the risk of uterine diseases: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiyan Mu; Xue Du; Kui Yao; Jitong Zhao; Ce Bian; Qiao Wang; Hongwei Ma; Tao Yi; Yang Wu; Xia Zhao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 3.  CYP2D6 genotyping and tamoxifen: an unfinished story in the quest for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Jonas A de Souza; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 4.  Tamoxifen and CYP2D6: a contradiction of data.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Howard L McLeod; William J Irvin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-24

5.  Nonhormonal management of hot flashes for women on risk reduction therapy.

Authors:  Kostandinos Sideras; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 6.  Molecular genetics and epigenetics of the cytochrome P450 gene family and its relevance for cancer risk and treatment.

Authors:  Cristina Rodriguez-Antona; Alvin Gomez; Maria Karlgren; Sarah C Sim; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Evaluation of CYP2D6 and efficacy of tamoxifen and raloxifene in women treated for breast cancer chemoprevention: results from the NSABP P1 and P2 clinical trials.

Authors:  Matthew P Goetz; Daniel J Schaid; D Lawrence Wickerham; Stephanie Safgren; Taisei Mushiroda; Michiaki Kubo; Anthony Batzler; Joseph P Costantino; Victor G Vogel; Soonmyung Paik; Erin E Carlson; David A Flockhart; Norman Wolmark; Yusuke Nakamura; Richard M Weinshilboum; James N Ingle; Matthew M Ames
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Metabolism and transport of tamoxifen in relation to its effectiveness: new perspectives on an ongoing controversy.

Authors:  Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Per Damkier; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.404

9.  CYP2D6 gene variants: association with breast cancer specific survival in a cohort of breast cancer patients from the United Kingdom treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.

Authors:  Jean E Abraham; Mel J Maranian; Kristy E Driver; Radka Platte; Bolot Kalmyrzaev; Caroline Baynes; Craig Luccarini; Mitul Shah; Susan Ingle; David Greenberg; Helena M Earl; Alison M Dunning; Paul D P Pharoah; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Associations between tamoxifen, estrogens, and FSH serum levels during steady state tamoxifen treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Gjerde; Jürgen Geisler; Steinar Lundgren; Dagfinn Ekse; Jan Erik Varhaug; Gunnar Mellgren; Vidar M Steen; Ernst A Lien
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.