BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed for staging of N0 neck in oral/oropharyngeal carcinomas. It is claimed that SNB may be superior to selective neck dissection (SND) with respect to quality of life (QOL) and postoperative morbidity. METHODS: Twenty-four patients after SNB and 25 patients after SND (levels I-III) were enrolled. QOL and psychosocial variables were assessed by the health-related EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, the disease-specific EORTC QLQ-H&N35 module, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a fear of progression questionnaire. The functional status was evaluated by scores for cervical scar, extent of lymphedema (Miller score), sensory function, function of facial and hypoglossal nerve, cervical spine, and shoulder (Constant score). RESULTS: Health-related QOL measurement revealed no differences between the 2 groups. Disease-specific QOL scores showed fewer swallowing problems in SNB patients (p = .043). SNB patients felt less fear of progression, experienced significantly less impairment from cervical scars, and had less sensory dysfunction and better shoulder function. CONCLUSION: Functional outcome after SNB is significantly better than after SND; however, this is not reflected in the scores of QOL questionnaires.
BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed for staging of N0 neck in oral/oropharyngeal carcinomas. It is claimed that SNB may be superior to selective neck dissection (SND) with respect to quality of life (QOL) and postoperative morbidity. METHODS: Twenty-four patients after SNB and 25 patients after SND (levels I-III) were enrolled. QOL and psychosocial variables were assessed by the health-related EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, the disease-specific EORTC QLQ-H&N35 module, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a fear of progression questionnaire. The functional status was evaluated by scores for cervical scar, extent of lymphedema (Miller score), sensory function, function of facial and hypoglossal nerve, cervical spine, and shoulder (Constant score). RESULTS: Health-related QOL measurement revealed no differences between the 2 groups. Disease-specific QOL scores showed fewer swallowing problems in SNB patients (p = .043). SNB patients felt less fear of progression, experienced significantly less impairment from cervical scars, and had less sensory dysfunction and better shoulder function. CONCLUSION: Functional outcome after SNB is significantly better than after SND; however, this is not reflected in the scores of QOL questionnaires.
Authors: Christina Bluemel; Domenico Rubello; Patrick M Colletti; Remco de Bree; Ken Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Robert L Ferris; Patrick Stefanika; Liqiang Xi; William Gooding; Raja R Seethala; Tony E Godfrey Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Christina Bluemel; Ken Herrmann; Alexander Kübler; Andreas K Buck; Eva Geissinger; Vanessa Wild; Stefan Hartmann; Constantin Lapa; Christian Linz; Urs Müller-Richter Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Francisco J Civantos; Sandro J Stoeckli; Robert P Takes; Julia A Woolgar; Remco de Bree; Vinidh Paleri; Kenneth O Devaney; Alessandra Rinaldo; Carl E Silver; Vanni Mondin; Jochen A Werner; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2010-03-05 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: J Solassol; V Burcia; V Costes; J Lacombe; A Mange; E Barbotte; D de Verbizier; C Cartier; M Makeieff; L Crampette; N Boulle; T Maudelonde; B Guerrier; R Garrel Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 7.640