Literature DB >> 19156672

A comparison of tests for restricted orderings in the three-class case.

Todd A Alonzo1, Christos T Nakas, Constantin T Yiannoutsos, Sherri Bucher.   

Abstract

A variety of methods for comparing three distributions have been proposed in the literature. These methods assess the same null hypothesis of equal distributions but differ in the alternative hypothesis they consider. The alternative hypothesis can be that measurements from the three classes are distributed according to unequal distributions or that measurements between the three classes follow a specific monotone ordering, an inverse-U-shaped (umbrella) ordering, or a U-shaped (tree) ordering. This paper compares these tests with respect to power and test size under different simulation scenarios. In addition, the methods are illustrated in two applications generated by different research questions with data from three classes suggesting monotone and umbrella orders. Additionally, proposals for the appropriate application of these tests are provided. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19156672     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  Extensions of empirical likelihood and chi-squared-based tests for ordered alternatives.

Authors:  M Carmen Pardo; Ying Lu; Alba M Franco-Pereira
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.

Authors:  Kristopher Attwood; Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  A new powerful nonparametric rank test for ordered alternative problem.

Authors:  Guogen Shan; Daniel Young; Le Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.