Literature DB >> 19156231

Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting: findings in regard to neuroclinical outcomes and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Hakan Posacioglu1, Cagatay Engin, Celal Cinar, Anil Z Apaydin, Ismail Oran, Mustafa Parildar, Cem Calli, Emrah Oguz, Ahmet Memis.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to evaluate prospectively the frequency and significance of brain lesions after elective carotid endarterectomy (CAE) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) by using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI) and then to correlate imaging findings with neuroclinical outcomes. From February 2003 through March 2005, 95 consecutive patients underwent surgical endarterectomy or CAS (with a cerebral protection device) at our institution. A total of 59 CAE procedures were performed in 46 consecutive patients (mean age, 65.8 +/- 9 yr), and 56 CAS procedures were performed in 49 consecutive patients (mean age, 66.3 +/- 9 yr). Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was performed in all patients within 24 hours of the procedure, both before and after. The post-procedural stroke rate was slightly higher in the CAS group, but this difference was not significant (5.4% vs 0). One early and 1 late death occurred in the stent group. Although the incidence of ischemic lesions was similar in both groups (surgery group, 12.5%; stent group, 13.5%), new DW MRI lesions were higher in the endarterectomy group (27.1% vs 12.5%, P=0.041). This difference was due chiefly to nonischemic lesions such as hemorrhage and watershed ischemia. In the analysis of patients with embolic ischemia, incidences of symptomatic stroke (P=0.046) and large infarct (P=0.013) were higher in the stent group. When we used protective devices during CAS, the incidence of embolic complications was similar to that of surgical enarterectomy. On the other hand, the clinical results of CAS need improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial occlusive diseases; brain ischemia; carotid stenosis; cerebral infarction; cerebrovascular disorders; endarterectomy, carotid; intracranial embolism and thrombosis; ischemic attack, transient; prospective studies; stents; stroke/prevention & control

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19156231      PMCID: PMC2607080     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  27 in total

1.  Induction of transient neurological dysfunction in baboons by platelet microemboli.

Authors:  C Kessler; A B Kelly; W D Suggs; J D Weissman; C M Epstein; S R Hanson; L A Harker
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  New magnetic resonance imaging methods for cerebrovascular disease: emerging clinical applications.

Authors:  T Neumann-Haefelin; M E Moseley; G W Albers
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Differences in number, size and location of intracranial microembolic lesions after surgical versus endovascular treatment without protection device of carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Holger Poppert; Oliver Wolf; Markus Resch; Wolfram Theiss; Till Schmidt-Thieme; Helga Graefin von Einsiedel; Peter Heider; Stefan Martinoff; Dirk Sander
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Silent cerebral ischemia detected by diffusion-weighted MRI after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  A Barth; L Remonda; K O Lövblad; G Schroth; R W Seiler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Hypotension and hypertension as consequences of baroreceptor dysfunction following carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  E L Bove; W J Fry; W S Gross; J C Stanley
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  New brain lesions at MR imaging after carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  Hans P M van Heesewijk; Jan Albert Vos; Elisabeth S Louwerse; Jos C Van Den Berg; Timotheus T C Overtoom; Sjef M P G Ernst; Henk W Mauser; Frans L Moll; Rob G A Ackerstaff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jay S Yadav; Mark H Wholey; Richard E Kuntz; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Patrick Whitlow; Neil E Strickman; Michael R Jaff; Jeffrey J Popma; David B Snead; Donald E Cutlip; Brian G Firth; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Halliday; A Mansfield; J Marro; C Peto; R Peto; J Potter; D Thomas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Intracerebral haemorrhage following carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  D A Russell; M J Gough
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.069

10.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Jack N Alpert
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

2.  Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Cagatay Engin; Hakan Posacioglu; Anil Ziya Apaydin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

3.  Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Traenka; Stefan T Engelter; Martin M Brown; Joanna Dobson; Chris Frost; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2019-01-15

4.  New cerebral lesions at magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gargiulo; Anna Sannino; Eugenio Stabile; Cinzia Perrino; Bruno Trimarco; Giovanni Esposito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.