INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a highly aggressive neoplasm with an incidence that is increasing world-wide. Mast cells are part of the innate immune system and have been associated with different solid tumors, but there is controversy surrounding their pro- and antitumorigenic effects in cancers. There are two subsets of human mast cells, resulting from the expression of different enzymes: tryptase positive mast cells and chymase positive mast cells. The purpose of this study was to determine the presence and prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating mast cells in mesothelioma. METHODS: Tryptase and chymase mast cell counts were determined by immunohistochemistry in 60 patients with mesothelioma. All pathologic samples were from patients who underwent treatment with intrapleural preoperative interleukin-2 (18 x 10(6) IU/d for 3 days). After one day of recovery, patients underwent surgery. Pleural samples were also immunostained for CD34 to evaluate microvessel count. RESULTS: High tryptase mast cells counts were found in the majority (73.3%) of the cases studied, and the results were significantly associated with both overall survival (p = 0.02) and time to progression (p = 0.01). This finding was confirmed using multivariate analysis: a higher tryptase mast cells count emerged as an independent favorable prognostic factor (p = 0.02). However, tryptase mast cells count did not show significant correlation with microvessel count. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that tumor infiltrating tryptase mast cells, after interleukin-2 preoperative induction therapy, predict improved clinical outcome in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, and highlight the critical role of the local inflammatory response in mesothelioma cancer progression.
INTRODUCTION:Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a highly aggressive neoplasm with an incidence that is increasing world-wide. Mast cells are part of the innate immune system and have been associated with different solid tumors, but there is controversy surrounding their pro- and antitumorigenic effects in cancers. There are two subsets of human mast cells, resulting from the expression of different enzymes: tryptase positive mast cells and chymase positive mast cells. The purpose of this study was to determine the presence and prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating mast cells in mesothelioma. METHODS: Tryptase and chymase mast cell counts were determined by immunohistochemistry in 60 patients with mesothelioma. All pathologic samples were from patients who underwent treatment with intrapleural preoperative interleukin-2 (18 x 10(6) IU/d for 3 days). After one day of recovery, patients underwent surgery. Pleural samples were also immunostained for CD34 to evaluate microvessel count. RESULTS: High tryptase mast cells counts were found in the majority (73.3%) of the cases studied, and the results were significantly associated with both overall survival (p = 0.02) and time to progression (p = 0.01). This finding was confirmed using multivariate analysis: a higher tryptase mast cells count emerged as an independent favorable prognostic factor (p = 0.02). However, tryptase mast cells count did not show significant correlation with microvessel count. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that tumor infiltrating tryptase mast cells, after interleukin-2 preoperative induction therapy, predict improved clinical outcome in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, and highlight the critical role of the local inflammatory response in mesothelioma cancer progression.
Authors: Matthew J Strouch; Eric C Cheon; Mohammad R Salabat; Seth B Krantz; Elias Gounaris; Laleh G Melstrom; Surabhi Dangi-Garimella; Edward Wang; Hidayatullah G Munshi; Khashayarsha Khazaie; David J Bentrem Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Adam J Bograd; Kei Suzuki; Eva Vertes; Christos Colovos; Eduardo A Morales; Michel Sadelain; Prasad S Adusumilli Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Kei Suzuki; Kyuichi Kadota; Camelia S Sima; Michel Sadelain; Valerie W Rusch; William D Travis; Prasad S Adusumilli Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: G Alì; L Boldrini; M Lucchi; A Picchi; M Dell'Omodarme; M C Prati; A Mussi; V Corsi; G Fontanini Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 7.640