Literature DB >> 19155988

A systematic approach to minimizing wound problems for de novo sirolimus-treated kidney transplant recipients.

Ho Yee Tiong1, Stuart M Flechner, Lingme Zhou, Alvin Wee, Barbara Mastroianni, Kathy Savas, David Goldfarb, Ithaar Derweesh, Charles Modlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wound healing problems and lymphoceles have been reported with greater frequency in kidney recipients given de novo sirolimus. This problem has led to increased patient morbidity and cost; and has been an impediment to the completion of randomized controlled trials in which wound problems have necessitated premature discontinuation of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors.
METHODS: We developed a systematic program to reduce these problems based on patient selection (body mass index [BMI] <32 kg/m2), the use of closed suction drains, modifications of surgical technique, and avoidance of a loading dose of sirolimus. Consecutive series of adult kidney-only recipients given antibody induction followed by de novo sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids were compared; group 1: 204 patients transplanted with few restrictions and group 2: 103 patients transplanted using the above program.
RESULTS: This approach resulted in a significant reduction (group 2 vs. group 1) in cumulative wound complications (7.8% vs. 19.6%, P=0.007), and nonoperative wound complications (2.9% vs. 14.2%, P=0.001). In addition, the incidence of lymphoceles detected (22.3% vs. 47.1%, P<0.0001), treated (4.8% vs. 24.5%, P<0.0001), or needing surgical intervention (1.9% vs. 14.2%, P=0.001) was significantly reduced. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a BMI more than 30 to 32 kg/m2 was the most significant variable related to delayed wound healing (odds ratio [OR] 3.01, 0.02) or surgical repair (OR 8.05, P=0.0001), whereas BMI (OR 1.54, P=0.038) and acute rejections (OR 1.34, P=0.03) were most associated with lymphocele treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: A systematic program of wound care using de novo sirolimus can produce wound healing complications comparable with that reported with other agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19155988     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318192dd56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  14 in total

1.  Successful treatment of ileal ulcers caused by immunosuppressants in two organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Yun-Wei Guo; Hua-Ying Gu; Kodjo-Kunale Abassa; Xian-Yi Lin; Xiu-Qing Wei
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  A Prospective Randomised Paired Trial of Sirolimus versus Tacrolimus as Primary Immunosuppression following Non-Heart Beating Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  John Asher; Nikhil Vasdev; Hugh Wyrley-Birch; Colin Wilson; Naeem Soomro; David Rix; Bryon Jaques; Derek Manas; Nicholas Torpey; David Talbot
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-08-20

Review 3.  Wound Healing in Patients With Impaired Kidney Function.

Authors:  Natallia Maroz; Richard Simman
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2014-06-08

4.  Suprapubic cystostomy during renal transplantation in a patient with a urethral stricture after hypospadias surgery: A case report.

Authors:  Shohei Kawaguchi; Yoshifumi Kadono; Takahiro Nohara; Yuki Kato; Renato Naito; Satoko Urata; Kazufumi Nakashima; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2019-01-27

5.  Wound Healing Complications in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus.

Authors:  Priscilla Ueno; Claudia Felipe; Alexandra Ferreira; Marina Cristelli; Laila Viana; Juliana Mansur; Geovana Basso; Pedro Hannun; Wilson Aguiar; Helio Tedesco Silva; Jose Medina-Pestana
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Post-renal transplant surgical complications with newer immunosuppressive drugs: mycophenolate mofetil vs. m-TOR inhibitors.

Authors:  Aneesh Srivastava; K Muruganandham; P B Vinodh; Pratipal Singh; Deepak Dubey; Rakesh Kapoor; Anant Kumar; Raj Kumar Sharma; Narayan Prasad
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Review of stentless, tubeless, apposed renal (STAR) transplant wound management programme.

Authors:  Hui Wen Melissa Tay; Pei Yi Sim; Yong Ai Teo; Lata Rahman; Ho Yee Tiong
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Prophylactic Wound Drainage in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kenneth D'Souza; Sean Patrick Crowley; Ahmer Hameed; Susanna Lam; Henry Claud Pleass; Carlo Pulitano; Jerome Martin Laurence
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2019-06-27

Review 9.  Lymphatic disorders after renal transplantation: new insights for an old complication.

Authors:  Andrea Ranghino; Giuseppe Paolo Segoloni; Fedele Lasaponara; Luigi Biancone
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2015-07-16

10.  Relationship between Post-kidney Transplantation Antithymocyte Globulin Therapy and Wound Healing Complications.

Authors:  G R Pourmand; S Dehghani; A Saraji; S Khaki; S H Mortazavi; A Mehrsai; H Sajadi
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.