Literature DB >> 19155901

Radiation-associated endometrial cancer.

Sanjeev Kumar1, Jay P Shah, Christopher S Bryant, Shelly Seward, Rouba Ali-Fehmi, Robert T Morris, John M Malone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare prognostic variables and survival of radiation-associated endometrial cancers with sporadic second endometrial cancers.
METHODS: Patients with primary cancers of pelvic organs (urinary system, colorectal, cervix, vulva, and vagina) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1973 and 2005. Among these patients, those who received pelvic radiation and subsequently developed endometrial cancer formed the radiation-associated endometrial cancers cohort (cases), whereas those who did not receive pelvic radiation but subsequently developed endometrial cancer formed the sporadic second endometrial cancers cohort (controls). Comparisons between radiation-associated endometrial cancers and sporadic second endometrial cancers used chi, t tests, Kaplan-Meier, and cox proportional hazards analysis.
RESULTS: In 205 radiation-associated endometrial cancer patients and 1,001 sporadic second endometrial cancer patients, the mean age of diagnosis was 65 years and 68 years, respectively (P<.001). The mean latency between primary pelvic organ cancer and second endometrial cancer was 110 months for the radiation-associated endometrial cancers and 77 months for the sporadic second endometrial cancers (P=.03). The lesions in the radiation-associated endometrial cancers cohort (compared with sporadic second endometrial cancers) were far more likely to be nonendometrioid histology (76.2% compared with 51%, P<.001), poorly differentiated (58% compared with 28%, P<.001), and advanced stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics III and IV [corrected] combined) (43% compared with 16%, P<.001). The 5-year survival rate for radiation-associated endometrial cancers and sporadic second endometrial cancers was 27.1% and 57.1%, respectively (P<.001). In multivariable analysis, after controlling for age, race, histology, stage, grade, and treatment, the hazard ratio for death of radiation-associated [corrected] endometrial cancers was 1.4 (95% ((CI)) [corrected] 1.2-3.6; P=.002).
CONCLUSION: The radiation-associated endometrial cancers carry a grave prognosis because they are more likely to be nonendometrioid, poorly differentiated advanced stage cancers. The longer latency and extensive spread at diagnosis among radiation-associated endometrial cancers may suggest a possible delay in clinical presentation and diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19155901     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181954c5b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  The diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer: progress and controversies.

Authors:  Dominik Denschlag; Uwe Ulrich; Günter Emons
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Risk and prognosis of second corpus uteri cancer after radiation therapy for pelvic cancer: A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Guanhua Yu; Ran Wei; Shuofeng Li; Yongjiao Wang; Hengchang Liu; Tianli Chen; Xu Guan; Xishan Wang; Zheng Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Immunosuppressive Glycodelin A is an independent marker for poor prognosis in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Miriam Lenhard; Sabine Heublein; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Thomas Vrekoussis; Isabel Lomba; Nina Ditsch; Doris Mayr; Klaus Friese; Udo Jeschke
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.