Literature DB >> 19155094

The effect of multiple cycles of contamination, detergent washing, and disinfection on the development of biofilm in endoscope tubing.

Karen Vickery1, Quan-D Ngo, Jean Zou, Yvonne E Cossart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient soil and bacterial biofilm in patient-ready endoscope channels can adversely impact the efficacy of detergent and disinfectant, thereby increasing the risk of nosocomial infection. Biofilm bacteria are firmly attached to one another and to the substrate by exopolysaccharide, making them difficult to remove. We analyzed the effect of 20 wash/contamination cycles on biofilm formation. MATERIALS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm-covered endoscope tubing was soaked in water (control), an enzymatic cleaner, or a nonenzymatic cleaner (Matrix) for 10 minutes and decontaminated in a washer-disinfector machine. Media containing P aeruginosa was then recycled to simulate contamination in clinical practice.
RESULTS: SEM analysis showed that loosely attached biofilm was removed under the high flow rates in the washer-disinfector. The control tubing remained 100% covered with biofilm, which became thicker with increased recontamination cycles. Washing in the enzymatic detergent retarded the redevelopment of biofilm. The nonenzymatic cleaner (Matrix) continued to remove more biofilm with an increasing number of wash/contamination cycles. At the 20th cycle, 90% of the tubing was biofilm-free.
CONCLUSION: Washing endoscopes under high flow rates with some detergents removes established biofilm and retards biofilm generation, emphasizing the importance of cleaning before disinfection. Continued research into the physicochemical mechanisms of biofilm adherence and removal is needed to optimize detergents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19155094     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

2.  Review of indicators for cross-sectoral optimization of nosocomial infection prophylaxis - a perspective from structurally- and process-oriented hygiene.

Authors:  Nils-Olaf Hübner; Steffen Fleßa; Ralf Jakisch; Ojan Assadian; Axel Kramer
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2012-04-04

3.  EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor (ECR) simulated-use and clinical-use evaluation of cleaning efficacy.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Pat DeGagne; Nancy Olson; Iram Fatima
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Surface Functionalization of Polyethersulfone Membrane with Quaternary Ammonium Salts for Contact-Active Antibacterial and Anti-Biofouling Properties.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Xiaohui Lin; Huabing Zhao; Zihao Chen; Jian Yang; Fan Li; Changjun Liu; Feng Tian
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Mild Positive Pressure Improves the Efficacy of Benzalkonium Chloride against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm.

Authors:  Shamaila Tahir; Sarah Emanuel; David W Inglis; Karen Vickery; Anand K Deva; Honghua Hu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-09

Review 6.  Single Use (Disposable) Duodenoscope: Recent Development and Future.

Authors:  Kihyun Ryu; Sunguk Jang
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-06-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.