Literature DB >> 19154373

Limited dispersal, budding dispersal, and cooperation: an experimental study.

Rolf Kümmerli1, Andy Gardner, Stuart A West, Ashleigh S Griffin.   

Abstract

Numerous theoretical studies have investigated how limited dispersal may provide an explanation for the evolution of cooperation, by leading to interactions between relatives. However, despite considerable theoretical attention, there has been a lack of empirical tests. In this article, we test how patterns of dispersal influence the evolution of cooperation, using iron-scavenging in the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa as our cooperative trait. We found that relatively limited dispersal does not favor cooperation. The reason for this is that although limited dispersal increases the relatedness between interacting individuals, it also leads to increased local competition for resources between relatives. This result supports Taylor's prediction that in the simplest possible scenario, the effects of increased relatedness and local competition exactly cancel out. In contrast, we show that one way for cooperation to be favored is if individuals disperse in groups (budding dispersal), because this maintains high relatedness while reducing local competition between relatives (relatively global competition).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19154373     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00548.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  63 in total

Review 1.  How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; François Rousset
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Molecular and regulatory properties of a public good shape the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Sam P Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Optimality models in the age of experimental evolution and genomics.

Authors:  J J Bull; I-N Wang
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 4.  Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation.

Authors:  Michael Taborsky; Joachim G Frommen; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Phage selection for bacterial cheats leads to population decline.

Authors:  Marie Vasse; Clara Torres-Barceló; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Evolutionary dynamics of n-player games played by relatives.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Cell-cell contacts confine public goods diffusion inside Pseudomonas aeruginosa clonal microcolonies.

Authors:  Thomas Julou; Thierry Mora; Laurent Guillon; Vincent Croquette; Isabelle J Schalk; David Bensimon; Nicolas Desprat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Gains of bacterial flagellar motility in a fungal world.

Authors:  Martin Pion; Redouan Bshary; Saskia Bindschedler; Sevasti Filippidou; Lukas Y Wick; Daniel Job; Pilar Junier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Antibiotic stress selects against cooperation in the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Marie Vasse; Robert J Noble; Andrei R Akhmetzhanov; Clara Torres-Barceló; James Gurney; Simon Benateau; Claire Gougat-Barbera; Oliver Kaltz; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Viscous medium promotes cooperation in the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Ashleigh S Griffin; Stuart A West; Angus Buckling; Freya Harrison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.