Literature DB >> 19154283

Accommodation, pupil diameter and myopia.

W Neil Charman1, Hema Radhakrishnan.   

Abstract

Concurrent measurements of steady-state accommodation response/stimulus curves and of pupil diameter were made in groups (n = 20) of young, adult myopes [age (mean +/- SD) 23.1 +/- 4.5 years, mean-sphere error (MSE) -3.06 +/- 2.35 D, range -0.60 to -8.54 D] and emmetropes (mean age 25.3 +/- 5.7 years, mean MSE -0.07 +/- 0.26 D, range -0.50 to +0.50 D). The aim of this study was to explore the possibilities that pupil diameters with relaxed accommodation were larger, and that accommodative miosis was weaker, in the myopic group. Such behaviour would lead to relatively greater degradation of the retinal images in the myopic group, even though aberrations at constant pupil diameter and dioptric accommodative lags in the two groups were the same: this might result in excessive axial growth and further myopia development. No evidence for any systematic refractive dependence of pupillary characteristics or accommodative responses was found. Interestingly, those subjects whose response/stimulus curves had a higher slope tended to display greater accommodative miosis, irrespective of their refractive error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19154283     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00611.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  8 in total

1.  Suitability of open-field autorefractors as pupillometers and instrument design effects.

Authors:  Carles Otero; Mikel Aldaba; Oriol Ferrer; Andrea Gascón; Juan C Ondategui-Parra; Jaume Pujol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Aberrations and accommodation.

Authors:  Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Philip B Kruger; Francisco Lara; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Changes in ciliary muscle thickness during accommodation in children.

Authors:  Helen Annie Lewis; Chiu-Yen Kao; Loraine T Sinnott; Melissa D Bailey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Photopic pupil size change in myopic orthokeratology and its influence on axial length elongation.

Authors:  Meng-Jun Zhu; Li Ding; Lin-Lin Du; Jun Chen; Xian-Gui He; Shan-Shan Li; Hai-Dong Zou
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Training regimen involving cyclic induction of pupil constriction during far accommodation improves visual acuity in myopic children.

Authors:  Kenji Yuda; Hiroshi Uozato; Naoto Hara; Wolfram Tetzlaff; Satoru Hisahara; Hiroko Horie; Satomi Nakajima; Hidenori Horie
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-26

6.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Accommodative responses under various viewing conditions in surgical patients with intermittent exotropia: an institutional, retrospective study.

Authors:  Ziyi Qi; Linlin Du; Jun Chen; Xun Xu; Xiangui He; Jun Qiang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Biometry of anterior segment of human eye on both horizontal and vertical meridians during accommodation imaged with extended scan depth optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Lin Leng; Yimin Yuan; Qi Chen; Meixiao Shen; Qingkai Ma; Beibei Lin; Dexi Zhu; Jia Qu; Fan Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.