BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) are responsible for assessing a patient's capacity for work and issuing a sickness certificate, enabling a patient to receive statutory sick pay and take time away from the workplace. The management of sickness absence across Europe varies considerably, and there is a need for comparable rates of certification to facilitate appropriate health and economic planning. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature reporting rates of sickness certification in general practice settings. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from their inception to November 2007. Inclusion criteria were reporting a measure of sickness certification, conducted in European primary care. RESULTS: 298 citations were identified from the literature search, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. These studies demonstrated that the rates of sickness certification are not routinely recorded. The certified rates were subject to wide variation, ranging from 18 per 100 person years in Norway to 239 per 100 person years in Malta. CONCLUSION: There is large variability in sickness certification policy and hence sickness certification rates across Europe. A system that enables comparisons across countries would be beneficial in ensuring health and economic planning. To enable a baseline rate of certification to be established and compared across countries, standardized reporting of sickness certification is needed.
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) are responsible for assessing a patient's capacity for work and issuing a sickness certificate, enabling a patient to receive statutory sick pay and take time away from the workplace. The management of sickness absence across Europe varies considerably, and there is a need for comparable rates of certification to facilitate appropriate health and economic planning. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature reporting rates of sickness certification in general practice settings. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from their inception to November 2007. Inclusion criteria were reporting a measure of sickness certification, conducted in European primary care. RESULTS: 298 citations were identified from the literature search, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. These studies demonstrated that the rates of sickness certification are not routinely recorded. The certified rates were subject to wide variation, ranging from 18 per 100 person years in Norway to 239 per 100 person years in Malta. CONCLUSION: There is large variability in sickness certification policy and hence sickness certification rates across Europe. A system that enables comparisons across countries would be beneficial in ensuring health and economic planning. To enable a baseline rate of certification to be established and compared across countries, standardized reporting of sickness certification is needed.
Authors: Monika Engblom; Gunnar Nilsson; Britt Arrelöv; Anna Löfgren; Ylva Skånér; Christina Lindholm; Elin Hinas; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Marek Nocun; Christopher C Butler; Magdalena Muras; Nils Fleten; Hasse Melbye Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2010-12-29 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Johanna Kausto; Jos H Verbeek; Jani H Ruotsalainen; Jaana I Halonen; Lauri J Virta; Eila Kankaanpää Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-05-14
Authors: Peder A Halvorsen; Katrine Wennevold; Nils Fleten; Magdalena Muras; Anna Kowalczyk; Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Hasse Melbye Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Harriet E Downing; Fran Carroll; Sara T Brookes; Sandra Hollinghurst; David Timmins; Elizabeth Orton; Kay Wang; Denise Kendrick; Paul Little; Mike V Moore; Anthony Harnden; Matthew Thompson; Margaret T May; Alastair D Hay Journal: Trials Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Gunnar H Nilsson; Britt Arrelöv; Christina Lindholm; Therese Ljungquist; Linnea Kjeldgård; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 2.655